Abstract:Introduction: Although acute stroke endovascular therapy (EVT) has dramatically improved outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusions (LVO), access to EVT-capable centers remains limited, particularly in rural areas. Therefore, it is essential to optimize triage systems for EVT-eligible patients. One strategy may be the use of a telestroke network that typically consists of multiple spoke sites that receive a consultation to determine appropriateness of patient transfer to an EVT-capable hub site. Standardization of AIS protocols may be necessary to achieve target door-to-groin (DTG) times of less than 60 minutes in EVT-eligible patients upon hub arrival. Specifically, the decision to obtain vascular imaging at the transferring hub site vs delaying until arrival at the hub is controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with reduced DTG time in LVO-AIS patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review for all patients treated over a 3.5-year period at our home hub institution. Patients were classified as telestroke transfers, non-telestroke transfers, and direct-to-hub presentations. We recorded demographic information, DTG time, reperfusion status, length of stay (LOS), functional status at discharge, seven-day mortality, and the site where vascular imaging- computed tomography angiography (CTA)-was obtained. We performed binary logistic regression to identify factors associated with DTG <60 minutes. Results: In the sample of EVT-eligible patients (n = 383), CTA was performed at the spoke site prior to transfer to the hub institution in 53% of cases. Further, 59% of telestroke transfer cases received a CTA prior to transfer compared to only 40% of non-telestroke transfers (59 vs 40%, P = 0.01). A Door-to-groin time <60 minutes was achieved in 67% of transfer patients who received pre-transfer CTA compared to only 22% of transfer patients who received CTA upon hub arrival and 17% of patients who presented directly to the hub. Ultimately, transfer patients who received CTA prior to transfer were 7.2 times more likely to have a DTG <60 minutes compared to those who did not (OR 7.2, 95% confidence interval 3.5-14.7; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Pre-transfer computed tomography angiography was the only significant predictor of achieving target door-to-groin times of less than 60 minutes. Because DTG time has been well established as a predictor of clinical outcomes, including pre-transfer CTA in a standardized acute ischemic stroke protocol may prove beneficial. Our findings also illustrate the need to optimize direct-to-hub stroke alerts and telestroke relationships to minimize workflow disruptions, which became more apparent during the pandemic.

Abstract WP66: Increases in Emergency Department Utilization of CT Angiography Brain and CT Perfusion in the Transferred Patient Population Across the Endovascular Therapy Era

The Role of Dual Energy CT in Evaluating Hemorrhagic Complications at Different Stages after Thrombectomy.

Abstract WP248: Pre-treatment Perfusion CT in Stroke Thrombolysis Can Predict Disability-free Life

Abstract WP68: National Database Demonstrates Substantial Delays Between Non-Contrast CT and CT Angiography in Suspected Stroke Patients in 2023

Abstract TP131: Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging Patterns Are Similar Before and After Interfacility Transfer of Ischemic Stroke Patients

Can non-contrast head CT and stroke severity be used for stroke triage? A population-based study

Trends in non-focal neurological chief complaints and CT angiography utilization among adults in the emergency department

Should they stay or should they go? Stroke transfers across a hospital network pre- and post-implementation of an automated image interpretation and communication platform

Abstract TMP91: Clinical Change During Inter-Hospital Transfer for Thrombectomy: Incidence, Associated Factors and Relationship With Outcome

Upfront vascular imaging in acute stroke: Impact on thrombectomy transfer time at a primary stroke center

National Trends and Outcomes of Hospital Presentation Mode for Endovascular Stroke Treatment in the U.S

Abstract TMP18: Real-World Challenges in US Thrombectomy Transfers: Difficulty Finding an Accepting Hospital, Prolonged Travel, and Differing Perceptions of Transfer Requirements

Advanced Imaging for Acute Stroke Treatment Selection: CT, CTA, CT Perfusion, and MR Imaging

Abstract WMP91: Ischemic Injury Extent on Different Imaging Modalities and Its Association With Endovascular Thrombectomy Outcomes for Large Core Stroke: A SELECT2 Imaging Analysis

Abstract 82: The Association of Transfer Status and Time on Clinical and Imaging Outcomes in Large Core Strokes: A SELECT2 Subanlaysis

Abstract WMP85: Mobile Stroke Unit: Direct To Angio Or Some Stops Along The Way?

Abstract WP67: Utilization and Impact of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Screening Practices and Selected Target Stroke III Strategies in the Get-with-the-Guidelines Registry Hospitals

Effect of time delay in inter-hospital transfer on outcomes of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke

Single-step Optimization in Triaging Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes: Identifying Factors to Improve Door-to-groin Time for Endovascular Therapy

Stroke transfers for thrombectomy in the era of extended time

Abstract WMP85: Outcomes in Transitioning From First-Line Conscious Sedation to General Anesthesia for Endovascular Thrombectomy