Abstract:Background: Patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke presenting with milder baseline clinical severity are common and require endovascular thrombectomy. However, such patients are difficult to recognize using pre-hospital severity-based triage tools and therefore are likely to require a secondary inter-hospital transfer if transported to a non-thrombectomy center. Given the potential for milder severity to represent better underlying cerebrovascular collateral circulation, it is unknown whether transfer delays are still associated with poorer post-stroke outcomes in this patient group. Aims: We primarily aimed to examine whether the harmful effect of inter-hospital transfer delay for thrombectomy was different for LVO patients with mild or severe deficits. Secondarily, we also investigated whether imaging markers of collateral circulation were different between severity groups. Methods: Registry data from two large Australian thrombectomy centers was used to identify all directly presenting and secondarily transferred LVO patients undergoing thrombectomy, divided into those with lower (NIHSS <10) and higher (NIHSS ≥10) baseline deficits. The primary outcome was functional independence or return to baseline defined as modified Rankin Scale 0-2 or baseline at 90-days. Patients with complete baseline CT-perfusion data were analyzed for imaging markers of collateral circulation by baseline severity group. Results: A total of n=1210 LVO patients undergoing thrombectomy were included, of which 273 (22.6%) had lower baseline severity. Despite similar thrombolysis and recanalization rates, transferred patients had lower odds of achieving the primary outcome compared to primary presentation to a thrombectomy-center, where baseline severity was higher (aOR 0.759 [95% CI 0.576-0.999]), but not when severity was lower (aOR 1.357 [95% CI 0.764-2.409], p-interaction=0.122). In the imaging analysis of n=436 patients, those with milder severity showed smaller median ischemic core volumes (12.6 [IQR 0.0-17.9] vs 27.5 [IQR 6.5-37.1] mL, p<0.001)), higher median perfusion mismatch ratio (10.8 [IQR 4.8-54.5] vs 6.6 [IQR 3.5-16.5], p<0.001) and lower median hypoperfusion intensity ratio (0.25 [IQR 0.18-0.38] vs 0.40 [IQR 0.22-0.57], p<0.001). Discussion: Patients receiving secondary inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy had poorer outcomes compared to those presenting directly to a thrombectomy-center if baseline deficits were severe, but this difference was not observed when baseline deficits were milder. This result may potentially be due to our secondary findings of significantly improved collateral circulation markers in lower severity LVO patients. As such, failure of pre-hospital screening tools to detect lower-severity LVO patients for pre-hospital bypass to a thrombectomy center may not necessarily deleteriously affect outcome. Data access statement: Anonymized data not published within this article will be made available by request from any qualified investigator.

Abstract TMP91: Clinical Change During Inter-Hospital Transfer for Thrombectomy: Incidence, Associated Factors and Relationship With Outcome

Clinical change during inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy: Incidence, associated factors, and relationship with outcome

Arterial Recanalization During Interhospital Transfer for Thrombectomy

Interfacility Transfer for Thrombectomy: A Promising Therapeutic Window

Inter‐hospital transfer for thrombectomy: transfer time is brain

Abstract WP117: Improvement of Collateral Status in Thrombectomy-Eligible Stroke Patients During Inter-Hospital Transfer: Association With Clinical Factors and Outcome

Large vessel occlusive stroke with milder baseline severity show better collaterals and reduced harm from thrombectomy transfer delays

Abstract 82: The Association of Transfer Status and Time on Clinical and Imaging Outcomes in Large Core Strokes: A SELECT2 Subanlaysis

Abstract TMP18: Real-World Challenges in US Thrombectomy Transfers: Difficulty Finding an Accepting Hospital, Prolonged Travel, and Differing Perceptions of Transfer Requirements

Effect of time delay in inter-hospital transfer on outcomes of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke

Abstract WP197: Poor Venous Outflow is Associated With Ischemic Core Growth During Transfer in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With a Large Vessel Occlusion

National Trends and Outcomes of Hospital Presentation Mode for Endovascular Stroke Treatment in the U.S

Abstract TP131: Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging Patterns Are Similar Before and After Interfacility Transfer of Ischemic Stroke Patients

Abstract TP149: Pretreatment Parameters Predicting Excellent Recanalization of Large Vessel Occlusion in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Medical complications during interhospital transfer for thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke

Influence of vascular imaging acquisition at local stroke centers on workflows in the drip-n-ship model: a RACECAT post hoc analysis

Abstract 141: Physician Transfer versus Patient Transfer for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Endovascular therapy in patients with a large ischemic volume at presentation: An aggregate patient-level analysis

Stroke transfers for thrombectomy in the era of extended time

Which Patients Require Physician-Led Inter-Hospital Transport in View of Endovascular Therapy?

One-Stop Management of 230 Consecutive Acute Stroke Patients: Report of Procedural Times and Clinical Outcome