Abstract:Stroke, Ahead of Print. Background:The effect of imaging selection paradigms on endovascular thrombectomy outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion remains uncertain. The study aimed to assess the effect of basic imaging (noncontrast computed tomography with or without computed tomographic angiography) versus advanced imaging (magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography perfusion) on clinical outcomes following thrombectomy in patients with stroke with large vessel occlusion in the early and extended windows using a pooled analysis of patient-level data from 2 pivotal randomized clinical trials done in China.Methods:This post hoc analysis used data from 1182 patients included in 2 multicenter, randomized controlled trials in China that evaluated adjunct therapies to endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke (Direct Endovascular Treatment for Large Artery Anterior Circulation Stroke performed from May 20, 2018, through May 2, 2020, and Intravenous Tirofiban Before Endovascular Treatment in Stroke from October 10, 2018, through October 31, 2021). Patients with occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery or proximal middle cerebral artery (M1/M2 segments) were categorized according to baseline imaging modality (basic versus advanced) as well as treatment time window (early, 0–6 hours versus extended, 6–24 hours from last known well to puncture). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2) at 90 days. Multivariable Poisson regression analysis was performed to determine the association between imaging selection modality and outcomes after endovascular treatment at each time windows.Results:A total of 1182 patients were included in this cohort analysis, with 648 in the early (471 with basic imaging versus 177 advanced imaging) and 534 in the extended (222 basic imaging versus 312 advanced imaging) time window. There were no differences in 90-day functional independence between the advanced and basic imaging groups in either time windows (early window: adjusted relative risk, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.84–1.16];P=0.91; extended window: adjusted relative risk, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.84–1.20];P=0.97).Conclusions:In this post hoc analysis of 2 randomized clinical trial pooled data involving patients with large vessel occlusion stroke, an association between imaging selection modality and clinical or safety outcomes for patients undergoing thrombectomy in either the early or extended windows was not detected. Our study adds to the growing body of literature on simpler imaging paradigms to assess thrombectomy eligibility across both the early and extended time windows.REGISTRATION:URL:http://www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifiers: ChiCTR-IOR-17013568 and ChiCTR-INR-17014167.

Upfront vascular imaging in acute stroke: Impact on thrombectomy transfer time at a primary stroke center

Endovascular Thrombectomy with or Without Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Stroke

Abstract WP68: National Database Demonstrates Substantial Delays Between Non-Contrast CT and CT Angiography in Suspected Stroke Patients in 2023

Abstract NS2: An Expedited Transfer Process Improves Door In Door Out Times

Single-step Optimization in Triaging Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes: Identifying Factors to Improve Door-to-groin Time for Endovascular Therapy

Abstract TP52: Reducing Door-to-Imaging Times in Acute Stroke Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department by Private Vehicle: Triage Hallway versus Room Evaluation

Abstract TMP14: Population-Based Intracranial Vascular Imaging for Acute Ischemic Stroke is Suboptimal

Abstract TMP38: Enhancing Door-In-Door-Out Time in a Rural Primary Stroke Center: Early Activation of a Large Vessel Occlusion Alert/Bundle of Care Utilizing EMS Pre-Alert, Parallel System Processing and Auto-Launch of Transfer Resources

Abstract NS1: Thrombolytic Door to Needle Times: Impact of Additional Multimodal Neuroimaging With Initial Imaging for All Patients versus Large Vessel Occlusion Screen Triage

Effect of time delay in inter-hospital transfer on outcomes of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke

Abstract TP61: 15 Minutes Can Save Lives: An EMS Direct to CT Protocol for Stroke Patients in the Emergency Department

Effect of Imaging Selection Paradigms on Endovascular Thrombectomy Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Abstract WMP85: Mobile Stroke Unit: Direct To Angio Or Some Stops Along The Way?

Abstract 34: Achieving a 30 Minute Door to Needle Time in a Primary Stroke Center via Telestroke

Influence of vascular imaging acquisition at local stroke centers on workflows in the drip-n-ship model: a RACECAT post hoc analysis

Abstract WP81: Validation Of Artificial Intelligence To Limit Delays In Acute Stroke Treatment And Endovascular Therapy (VALIDATE)

Thrombectomy Outcomes for Anterior Circulation Stroke in the 6–24 h Time Window Solely Based On NCCT and CTA: A Single Center Study

Perfusion Imaging for Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Is Associated With Improved Functional Outcomes in the Early and Late Time Windows.

Stroke transfers for thrombectomy in the era of extended time

Abstract WP67: Utilization and Impact of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Screening Practices and Selected Target Stroke III Strategies in the Get-with-the-Guidelines Registry Hospitals

Abstract WP66: Increases in Emergency Department Utilization of CT Angiography Brain and CT Perfusion in the Transferred Patient Population Across the Endovascular Therapy Era