Abstract:Although consequences of sharing personal information can be negative and severe (e.g., identity theft), individuals still engage in extensive self-disclosures on social networks. One commonly applied explanatory approach is the privacy calculus. Following this, self-disclosures can be conceptualized as rational choices resulting from a weighing of risks and benefits. However, this view misses the additional impulsive nature of decisions. The current study therefore takes the lens of dual-process theories and highlights that self-disclosure decisions can also be guided by an impulsive system. To test for the impact of descriptive social norms, a warning message, privacy-related decision-making styles, and perceived benefits and risks on individuals’ self-disclosure decisions, the fictitious social network “AHOY!” was created. It enabled the measurement of participants’ (N = 551; Mage = 40.77, SDage = 13.93) actual self-disclosures on two decision stages: 1) whether or not a post was created, 2) how much information (on a psychological and informational dimension) was provided. Further, descriptive social norms (i.e., the extent of other users’ self-disclosures) and the presence/absence of a warning message were varied. The remaining factors were measured using questionnaires. The results imply that cognitive and affective processes (expected to be triggered by the investigated factors) are involved differently in the two decision stages. While both the reflective and impulsive system may be involved in the first stage, with the reflective system also potentially taking a predominant role, the impulsive system may be predominant when deciding how much to disclose. This highlights the importance of exceeding common assumptions of rationality to better understand and support individuals’ self-disclosure decisions.

Visiting Theories That Predict College Students' Self-Disclosure on Facebook

Visiting theories that predict college students' self-disclosure on Facebook

The Influence of Personality Traits and Social Networks on the Self-Disclosure Behavior of Social Network Site Users

College Students' Disclosure of Location-Related Information on Facebook.

Need for Affiliation, Need for Popularity, Self-Esteem, and the Moderating Effect of Big Five Personality Traits Affecting Individuals’ Self-Disclosure on Facebook

Self-disclosure under social networking sites: a risk-utility decision model

A dual-process model to explain self-disclosure on online social networking sites: examining the moderating effect of enjoyment

Analysis of the Inlfuencing Factors on Social Media Users’ Self-disclosure

Consumer motivations to disclose information and participate in commercial activities on Facebook

“What’s on Your Mind?” Examining the Influence of Facebook User Motivations, Usage Intensity, and Public Self-Disclosure on Perceived Social Capital

Investigating information sharing behavior: the mediating roles of the desire to share information in virtual communities

Social media cultivating perceptions of privacy: A 5-year analysis of privacy attitudes and self-disclosure behaviors among Facebook users

Relationships in the Digital Age: Self-disclosure and Communication in Social Networking Sites

Attitudes toward Self-Disclosure on Facebook: A Review of Perception, Emotion and Behavior in University Students

Self-disclosure on social networks: More than a rational decision-making process

Personality disclosure on social network sites: An empirical examination of differences in Facebook usage behavior, profile contents and privacy settings

Understanding Social Network sites continuance Intention from a Self-Disclosure and Social Capital Perspective.

Factors Affecting Privacy Disclosure on Social Network Sites: an Integrated Model

Self-disclosure on social media: The role of perceived network responsiveness

Factors affecting privacy disclosure on social network sites

When Facebook Becomes a Part of the Self: How Do Motives for Using Facebook Influence Privacy Management?