Abstract:We analyze how stylized Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs), and specifically the widely‐used Dynamic Integrated Climate‐Economy model (DICE), represent the cost of emissions abatement. Many assume temporal independence—that abatement costs in one period are not affected by prior abatement. We contrast this with three dimensions of dynamic realism in emitting systems: (i) inertia, (ii) induced innovation, and (iii) path dependence. We review key evidence from the last quarter century on each of these three components. Studies of stock lifetime, dynamics of diffusion and past transitions suggest typical transition timescales of at least 20–40 years for the bulk emitting systems. The evidence that substantial innovation is induced by both prices and market deployment is unambiguous. Finally, both data and a rapidly growing literature demonstrate substantial path dependence in general, and specifically "carbon lock‐in and lock‐out." Some stylized models in the past decade have incorporated technology learning, and others have considered inertia, but the combination of these factors is important and not yet evident. More complex hybrid IAMs with technology‐rich energy‐system models incorporate these factors, but their complexity has limited the wider understanding and influence of their underlying insights. Few if any global models fully represent path dependence. We conclude with likely implications drawing upon the empirical and modeling evidence accumulated, including results from extending DICE with a highly stylized representation of such dynamic factors. This suggests that dynamic interdependencies could multiply several‐fold the optimal level of initial abatement expenditure. This is because early abatement then also directly facilitates subsequent emission savings. The diversity of dynamic linkages across sectors and technologies also implies more nuanced policy than a single global carbon price. Thus, the issues explored in this review can radically change the general policy conclusions drawn from models, which, like DICE, neglect dynamic realism.This article is categorized under: <ul class="plain-list"><li>Climate Economics > Aggregation Techniques for Impacts and Mitigation Costs</li></ul>

Robust Simulation of Environmental Policies Using the DICE Model

Robust Simulation of Global Warming Policies Using the Dice Model

Assessing the Performance of the Independence Method in Modeling Spatial Extreme Rainfall

Solving stochastic climate-economy models: A deep least-squares Monte Carlo approach

Modeling myths: On DICE and dynamic realism in integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation

Two-Stage Robust Model of Day-ahead Dispatch Considering Carbon Trading and Life Cycle Theory

Robust Simulation of Stochastic Systems with Input Uncertainties Modeled by Statistical Divergences

Environmental Economics and Uncertainty: Review and a Machine Learning Outlook

A Two-Step Approach to Investigate the Effect of Rating Curve Uncertainty in the Elbe Decision Support System

Robust Consensus Modeling: Concerning Consensus Fairness and Efficiency with Uncertain Costs

Simulation in discrete choice models evaluation: SDCM, a simulation tool for performance evaluation of DCMs

Simulation and identification of spatial uncertainty of urban air pollution: A case study in Dalian Municipality, China

Impact of Uncertainty Parameter Distribution on Robust Decision Making Outcomes for Climate Change Adaptation under Deep Uncertainty

A Matlab and CasADi-based Implementation of RICE Dynamic Game

Towards robust statistical inference for complex computer models

Building Up a Computer Model to Simulate the Impact of Carbon Emission Mitigation on Economy Society in China

Modeling Urban Eco-Environmental Sustainability under Uncertainty: Interval Double-Sided Chance-Constrained Programming with Spatial Analysis

Robust Simulation with Likelihood-Ratio Constrained Input Uncertainty

Modeling Environmental Impacts of Urban Expansion: a Systematic Method for Dealing with Uncertainties.

Environmental-economic Unit Commitment Using Mixed-Integer Linear Programming

Multiple Land-Use Simulations and Driving Factor Analysis by Integrating a Deep Cascade Forest Model and Cellular Automata: A Case Study in the Pearl River Delta, China