Abstract:Abstract To analyse climate change mitigation strategies, economists rely on simplified climate models—so-called climate emulators—that provide a realistic quantitative link between CO2 emissions and global warming at low computational costs. In this paper, we propose a generic and transparent calibration and evaluation strategy for these climate emulators that are based on freely and easily accessible state-of-the-art benchmark data from climate sciences. We demonstrate that the appropriate choice of the free model parameters can be of key relevance for the predicted social cost of carbon. The key idea we put forward is to calibrate the simplified climate models to benchmark data from comprehensive global climate models that took part in the coupled model intercomparison project, phase 5 (CMIP5). In particular, we propose to use four different test cases that are considered pivotal in the climate science literature: two highly idealized tests to separately calibrate and evaluate the carbon cycle and temperature response, an idealized test to quantify the transient climate response, and a final test to evaluate the performance for scenarios close to those arising from economic models, and that include exogenous forcing. As a concrete example, we re-calibrate the climate part of the widely used DICE-2016, fathoming the CMIP5 uncertainty range of model responses: the multi-model mean as well as extreme, but still permissible climate sensitivities and carbon cycle responses. We demonstrate that the functional form of the climate emulator of the DICE-2016 model is fit for purpose, despite its simplicity, but its carbon cycle and temperature equations are miscalibrated, leading to the conclusion that one may want to be skeptical about predictions derived from DICE-2016. We examine the importance of the calibration for the social cost of carbon in the context of a partial equilibrium setting where interest rates are exogenous, as well as the simple general equilibrium setting from DICE-2016. We find that the model uncertainty from different consistent calibrations of the climate system can change the social cost of carbon by a factor of 4 if one assumes a quadratic damage function. When calibrated to the multi-model mean, our model predicts similar values for the social cost of carbon as the original DICE-2016, but with a strongly reduced sensitivity to the discount rate and about 1 degree less long-term warming. The social cost of carbon in DICE-2016 is oversensitive to the discount rate, leading to extreme comparative statics responses to changes in preferences.

A Matlab and CasADi-based Implementation of RICE Dynamic Game

How Cooperation and Competition Arise in Regional Climate Policies: RICE as a Dynamic Game

AI for Global Climate Cooperation: Modeling Global Climate Negotiations, Agreements, and Long-Term Cooperation in RICE-N

AI4GCC - Team: Below Sea Level: Critiques and Improvements

Feedback, Dynamics, and Optimal Control in Climate Economics

Issue Tying-in of Technology Transfers and Clean Development Mechanism Using Game Model

Robust Simulation of Global Warming Policies Using the Dice Model

Robust Simulation of Environmental Policies Using the DICE Model

Multi-objective Optimal Control of Dynamic Integrated Model of Climate and Economy: Evolution in Action

Building Interpretable Climate Emulators for Economics

Explore the possibility of advancing climate negotiations on the basis of regional trade organizations: A study based on RICE-N

Modeling myths: On DICE and dynamic realism in integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation

The Climate in Climate Economics

AI4GCC-Team -- Below Sea Level: Score and Real World Relevance

Sliding Window Games for Cooperative Building Temperature Control Using a Distributed Learning Method

Evolution of modeling of the economics of global warming: changes in the DICE model, 1992–2017

AI For Global Climate Cooperation 2023 Competition Proceedings

Climate Policy under Spatial Heat Transport: Cooperative and Noncooperative Regional Outcomes

A Game of Competition for Risk

Solving stochastic climate-economy models: A deep least-squares Monte Carlo approach

How to Use Data Science in Economics -- a Classroom Game Based on Cartel Detection