Abstract:Online voting is attractive for convenience and accessibility, but is more susceptible to voter coercion and vote buying than in-person voting. One mitigation is to give voters fake voting credentials that they can yield to a coercer. Fake credentials appear identical to real ones, but cast votes that are silently omitted from the final tally. An important unanswered question is how ordinary voters perceive such a mitigation: whether they could understand and use fake credentials, and whether the coercion risks justify the costs of mitigation. We present the first systematic study of these questions, involving 150 diverse individuals in Boston, Massachusetts. All participants "registered" and "voted" in a mock election: 120 were exposed to coercion resistance via fake credentials, the rest forming a control group. Of the 120 participants exposed to fake credentials, 96% understood their use. 53% reported that they would create fake credentials in a real-world voting scenario, given the opportunity. 10% mistakenly voted with a fake credential, however. 22% reported either personal experience with or direct knowledge of coercion or vote-buying incidents. These latter participants rated the coercion-resistant system essentially as trustworthy as in-person voting via hand-marked paper ballots. Of the 150 total participants to use the system, 87% successfully created their credentials without assistance; 83% both successfully created and properly used their credentials. Participants give a System Usability Scale score of 70.4, which is slightly above the industry's average score of 68. Our findings appear to support the importance of the coercion problem in general, and the promise of fake credentials as a possible mitigation, but user error rates remain an important usability challenge for future work.

Too cool for school: Participatory shirking and U.S. House passage of proxy voting

Proxy voting in the U.S. House of Representatives: Legislative shirking in new clothing?

The rise of partisanship and super-cooperators in the U.S. House of Representatives

On the Potential and Limitations of Proxy Voting: Delegation with Incomplete Votes

Proxy Selection in Transitive Proxy Voting

Strategic Proxy Voting on the Line

Follower-Followee Network, Communication Networks, and Vote Agreement of the U.S. Members of Congress

Representation with Incomplete Votes

Electoral system influence on social network usage patterns of parliamentary assistants as their legislators’ stand-in: The United States, Germany, and Israel

E-Vote Your Conscience: Perceptions of Coercion and Vote Buying, and the Usability of Fake Credentials in Online Voting

Partisanship vs. Principle: Understanding Public Opinion on Same-Day Registration

The Weakness of Cumulative Voting

Ideology, Party, and Opinion: Explaining Individual Legislator ACA Implementation Votes in the States

Widespread Partisan Gerrymandering Mostly Cancels Nationally, but Reduces Electoral Competition

Votemandering: Strategies and Fairness in Political Redistricting

Cross-National Measurement of Polarization in Political Discourse: Analyzing floor debate in the U.S. and the Japanese legislatures

Pork barrel politics, voter turnout, and inequality: An experimental study

Pandering in a Flexible Representative Democracy

Strategic communication in committees with expressive payoffs

Fostering Democratic Participation at Community Colleges: Understanding the Relationship Between Voting and Student, Institutional, and Environmental Factors

Descriptive Representation and Innovation in American Legislatures