Abstract:American democracy is struggling. Political polarization has exacerbated division within the electorate, while gerrymandering and hyper-polarization mean only a handful of elections are truly competitive. Voters feel increasingly disenchanted with the major parties and starved for choice. Hungry for solutions, states have turned to a particular form of Ranked Choice Voting called Instant Runoff Voting, now adopted in two states and on the ballot on more this fall. Its promise of greater choice holds intuitive appeal to those interested in improving American democratic institutions.This article sounds the alarm that the rush to reform by adopting Instant Runoff Voting may prove misguided. Well-intentioned advocates have backed a system that treats symptoms, not the root causes of democratic disfunction. We reframe the discussion in terms of robust electoral competition, evaluating voting systems on their incentive structures shaping the political positioning of candidates’ platforms and the extent to which those platforms are responsive to the will of the voters. On those metrics, we argue, the form of Ranked Choice Voting spreading across the country comes up short in much the same ways that our current plurality system fails.We provide a two-part corrective. On a theoretical level, we offer a framework that ties the representativeness of an electoral system to the degree to which it promotes political competition. We show how alternative voting systems can create stronger competitive pressures resulting in more representative election outcomes. On a practical level, we show an alternative Ranked Choice system called Condorcet voting could restore lost incentives within existing constraints. Unlike our current plurality system or Instant Runoff Voting, Condorcet voting ensures that a candidate preferred by a majority over others must win, thereby creating strong competitive pressures resulting in more representative outcomes. We map a feasible path toward revived democratic responsiveness.

The Weakness of Cumulative Voting

Partially Informed Elections -- Analyzing the Impact of Forced Ballot Truncation on Bucklin, Coombs, Plurality with Runoff, and Schulze

Fair and Inclusive Participatory Budgeting: Voter Experience with Cumulative and Quadratic Voting Interfaces

Cycles in synchronous iterative voting: general robustness and examples in Approval Voting

Positionality-Weighted Aggregation Methods for Cumulative Voting

New fairness criteria for truncated ballots in multi-winner ranked-choice elections

Candidate Incentive Distributions: How voting methods shape electoral incentives

End-to-end Verifiable Cumulative Voting Without Tallying Authorities

The Schulze Method of Voting

Repeat Voting: Two-Vote May Lead More People To Vote

Split Cycle: A New Condorcet Consistent Voting Method Independent of Clones and Immune to Spoilers

Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference?

Statement Voting.

An Examination of Ranked Choice Voting in the United States, 2004-2022

Assessment Voting in Large Electorates

Robust Electoral Competition: Rethinking Electoral Systems to Encourage Representative Outcomes

Tradeoffs in Hierarchical Voting Systems

Multiwinner Elections and the Spoiler Effect

Voting with Limited Information and Many Alternatives

The Role of Cumulative Voting in Protecting Minority Shareholders in Listed Companies

STAR Voting, equality of voice, and voter satisfaction: considerations for voting method reform