Fair and Inclusive Participatory Budgeting: Voter Experience with Cumulative and Quadratic Voting Interfaces

Thomas Wellings,Fatemeh Banaie Heravan,Abhinav Sharma,Lodewijk Gelauff,Regula Hänggli Fricker,Evangelos Pournaras

2023-11-06

Abstract:Cumulative and quadratic voting are two distributional voting methods that are expressive, promoting fairness and inclusion, particularly in the realm of participatory budgeting. Despite these benefits, graphical voter interfaces for cumulative and quadratic voting are complex to implement and use effectively. As a result, such methods have not seen yet widespread adoption on digital voting platforms. This paper addresses the challenge by introducing an implementation and evaluation of cumulative and quadratic voting within a state-of-the-art voting platform: Stanford Participatory Budgeting. The findings of the study show that while voters prefer simple methods, the more expressive (and complex) cumulative voting becomes the preferred one compared to k-ranking voting that is simpler but less expressive. The implemented voting interface elements are found useful and support the observed voters' preferences for more expressive voting methods. *

Software Engineering

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the application and user experience of two distributed voting methods, cumulative voting and quadratic voting, on digital voting platforms. Specifically, the paper aims to address the following issues:

1. **Implementing Complex Voting Methods**: Although cumulative voting and quadratic voting can enhance fairness and inclusivity, their graphical user interfaces (GUIs) are relatively complex, making them difficult to implement and use effectively. Therefore, the paper attempts to optimize the experience of these complex voting methods by improving the user interface.
2. **User Preference Study**: The study investigates participants' preferences for different voting methods and their user interfaces to understand whether users prefer simpler but less expressive methods or are willing to accept more complex methods that better express their preferences.
3. **Optimizing Design**: The paper evaluates the effectiveness of different user interface designs through experiments to optimize the user experience of cumulative voting and quadratic voting.

By implementing cumulative voting and quadratic voting on the Stanford Participatory Budgeting platform and conducting user experiments, the paper finds that although users generally prefer simpler voting methods, cumulative voting is more effective in expressing preferences compared to other simple methods and is favored by most users. Additionally, the paper emphasizes the importance of user interface design in enhancing user satisfaction and provides suggestions for further optimizing these complex voting methods in the future.