Participatory Budget Allocation Method for Approval Ballots

Rutvik Page,Arnav Doifode,Jitendra Tembhurne,Aishwarya Sagar Anand Ukey
2024-10-09
Abstract:In this paper, we study the problem of Participatory Budgeting (PB) with approval ballots, inspired by Multi-Winner Voting schemes. We present generalized preference aggregation methods for participatory budgeting, especially for finding seemingly fair budget allocations. To achieve this, we generalize such preference aggregation methods from the well-known methods, namely the Sequential Chamberlin Courant rule and the Sequential Monroe Rule in the realm of social choice theory. Further, we provide an experimental evaluation of the preference aggregation methods using an impartial culture method of preference generation and study the extent to which such polynomial time algorithms satisfy one of the most popular notions of fairness called proportional representation.
Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to solve the fairness problem in **Participatory Budgeting (PB)**, especially in the case of Approval Ballots. Specifically, the paper focuses on how to find an apparently fair budget allocation scheme by aggregating voters' preferences to ensure the maximum satisfaction of voters. #### Main problem description 1. **Define fairness**: The paper explores how to define the concept of "fairness", especially in budget allocation. An important criterion for fairness is **Proportional Representation (PR)**, that is, to ensure that a group of like - minded and large enough voters will not be ignored. 2. **Design efficient algorithms**: After defining fairness, the paper proposes how to design algorithms that can run in polynomial time to output budgets that meet these fairness criteria. Since strict fairness requirements may lead to NP - hard problems, a trade - off between strictness and computational efficiency needs to be made. #### Specific research contents - **Adapt to existing rules**: The paper applies two well - known rules in social choice theory - **Sequential Chamberlin - Courant Rule (SCCR)** and **Sequential Monroe Rule (SMR)** - to the participatory budget allocation problem. These two rules were originally used for multi - winner elections and are now extended to handle project selection under a fixed budget. - **Experimental evaluation**: The author uses the **Impartial Culture Method** to generate voter preferences and conducts experimental evaluations on the proposed algorithms to study to what extent these polynomial - time algorithms can meet proportional representation. - **Introduce new axioms**: The paper also proposes a new fairness axiom and verifies the performance of different algorithms in meeting this axiom through experiments. #### Conclusions The main contributions of the paper include: - Proposing a new fairness axiom. - Adapting the SCCR and SMR rules to the participatory budget allocation problem. - Experimentally evaluating the performance of these rules in meeting proportional representation. - Using visualization tools to prove the effectiveness of Standard Transferrable Voting (STV) in selecting budgets with proportional representation. In general, this paper attempts to improve the fairness and efficiency of participatory budget allocation by improving the existing preference aggregation methods.