Fair Lotteries for Participatory Budgeting

Haris Aziz,Xinhang Lu,Mashbat Suzuki,Jeremy Vollen,Toby Walsh
2024-04-11
Abstract:In pursuit of participatory budgeting (PB) outcomes with broader fairness guarantees, we initiate the study of lotteries over discrete PB outcomes. As the projects have heterogeneous costs, the amount spent may not be equal ex ante and ex post. To address this, we develop a technique to bound the amount by which the ex-post spend differs from the ex-ante spend -- the property is termed budget balanced up to one project (BB1). With respect to fairness, we take a best-of-both-worlds perspective, seeking outcomes that are both ex-ante and ex-post fair. Towards this goal, we initiate a study of ex-ante fairness properties in PB, including Individual Fair Share (IFS), Unanimous Fair Share (UFS) and their stronger variants, as well as Group Fair Share (GFS). We show several incompatibility results between these ex-ante fairness notions and existing ex-post concepts based on justified representation. One of our main contributions is a randomized algorithm which simultaneously satisfies ex-ante Strong UFS, ex-post full justified representation (FJR) and ex-post BB1 for PB with binary utilities.
Computer Science and Game Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the fairness issue in Participatory Budgeting (PB), especially to achieve stronger fairness and budget balance in discrete project selection. Specifically, the paper mainly focuses on the following points: 1. **Introducing a Randomization Mechanism**: In order to achieve stronger fairness in Participatory Budgeting, the author proposes the use of a randomization method (i.e., the lottery mechanism), through which a certain degree of fairness can be guaranteed both ex - ante and ex - post. 2. **Budget Balance Problem**: Due to different project costs, there may be differences between the pre - allocated probabilities and the actual expenditures. For this reason, the author proposes a technique to limit the difference between ex - post and ex - ante expenditures, ensuring that the budget is balanced up to one project (BB1). 3. **Definition of Fairness**: The paper defines several fairness concepts, including Individual Fair Share (IFS), Unanimous Fair Share (UFS) and their strong versions (Strong IFS and Strong UFS), as well as Group Fair Share (GFS). These concepts aim to ensure that each voter or group obtains reasonable representation and benefits in budget allocation. 4. **Compatibility Research**: The author explores the compatibility between these ex - ante fairness concepts and existing ex - post fairness concepts (such as Justified Representation, JR), and shows cases where certain combinations cannot be satisfied simultaneously. 5. **Algorithm Design**: The paper proposes a randomized algorithm that can simultaneously meet the requirements of ex - ante Strong UFS, ex - post Full Justified Representation (FJR) and ex - post BB1, and is applicable to Participatory Budgeting problems with binary utilities. In summary, the core issue of this paper is to achieve stronger fairness and budget balance in Participatory Budgeting by introducing a randomization mechanism, while ensuring that these mechanisms are theoretically and technically feasible.