Exploring Welfare Maximization and Fairness in Participatory Budgeting

Gogulapati Sreedurga
2024-10-26
Abstract:Participatory budgeting (PB) is a voting paradigm for distributing a divisible resource, usually called a budget, among a set of projects by aggregating the preferences of individuals over these projects. It is implemented quite extensively for purposes such as government allocating funds to public projects and funding agencies selecting research proposals to support. This PhD dissertation studies the welfare-related and fairness-related objectives for different PB models. Our contribution lies in proposing and exploring novel PB rules that maximize welfare and promote fairness, as well as, in introducing and investigating a range of novel utility notions, axiomatic properties, and fairness notions, effectively filling the gaps in the existing literature for each PB model. The thesis is divided into two main parts, the first focusing on dichotomous and the second focusing on ordinal preferences. Each part considers two cases: (i) the cost of each project is restricted to a single value and partial funding is not permitted and (ii) the cost of each project is flexible and may assume multiple values.
Computer Science and Game Theory,Artificial Intelligence,Multiagent Systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the issues of welfare maximization and fairness in Participatory Budgeting (PB). Specifically, the paper focuses on how to achieve welfare maximization and promote fairness in different PB models. The following are the main research questions of the paper: 1. **Welfare Maximization**: - How to design effective rules to maximize the overall social welfare? This includes welfare maximization under different preference types (such as dichotomous preferences and ordinal preferences) and cost structures (fixed cost and flexible cost). 2. **Fairness**: - How to ensure fairness in the resource allocation process? Especially fairness among different groups and individuals. The paper introduces multiple fairness concepts and explores the applicability and implementation methods of these concepts in different PB models. ### Specific Problem Sub - division #### 1. Dichotomous Preferences 1. **Fixed Cost**: - **Egalitarian Participatory Budgeting**: A natural egalitarian rule - Maxmin Participatory Budgeting (MPB) is studied, which aims to maximize the welfare in the worst - case scenario (i.e., minimize the maximum dissatisfaction). The paper analyzes the computational complexity and axiomatic properties of MPB. 2. **Flexible Cost**: - **Welfare Maximization under Multi - level Project Complexity**: A new PB model is introduced, in which each project has multiple allowed cost values, reflecting different levels of project complexity. Voters express their preferences by specifying the upper and lower limits of each project. The paper proposes multiple utility concepts and welfare maximization rules and analyzes their computational complexity and axiomatic properties. #### 2. Ordinal Preferences 1. **Fixed Cost**: - **Welfare Maximization and Fairness under Incomplete Weak - order Preferences**: How to maximize welfare and ensure fairness under incomplete weak - order preferences is studied. New rules and axioms such as dichotomous translation rules and PB - Chamberlin - Courant (PB - CC) rule are introduced, and a new axiom - pro - affordability is proposed. 2. **Flexible Cost**: - **Group - level and Individual - level Fairness Rules under Unimodal Preferences**: How to achieve group - level and individual - level fairness under unimodal preferences is studied. The paper introduces concepts such as group - wise anonymity and proposes weak group entitlement guarantee and strong group entitlement guarantee to ensure fairness among different groups. ### Summary By introducing new PB rules, utility concepts and fairness concepts, the paper fills the gaps in the existing literature, especially in the research on welfare maximization and fairness under different preference types and cost structures. The paper not only provides theoretical analysis, but also conducts computational complexity analysis and axiomatic analysis, providing valuable references for practical applications. Hope this information can help you understand the research focus and objectives of this paper. If you have more specific questions or need further explanation, please feel free to let us know!