Multi-institutional Study Examining Intraoperative Entrustment and Resident Sex

Samantha Baker,Julie Evans,Niki Matusko,Brenessa Lindeman,Sarah Jung,Sebin Choi,Rebecca Minter,Mackenzie Cook,Karen Brasel,Gurjit Sandhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115925
IF: 3.125
2024-08-27
The American Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Introduction Single-site studies have found variable associations between gender and entrustment-based interactions during surgical residency. We sought to assess the relationship between resident sex and intraoperative entrustment at multiple institutions. Methods Surgical cases were observed at four university-based training programs. Faculty entrustment and resident entrustability were rated using OpTrust. OpTrust is a validated intraoperative entrustment measurement tool which enables trained third-party raters to objectively score resident and faculty behaviors in the operating room. Independent sample t-tests and regression analysis with cluster adjusted standard errors were used. Results 337 cases were observed which included 149 residents (54% female) and 97 faculty members (30% female). There was no difference in resident entrustability based on resident sex (p=0.30). Female residents were more likely to be involved in cases rated as more difficult (p=0.04). At a single site, male residents scored higher on resident entrustability (p=0.007) and faculty entrustment (p=0.022). Conclusion Entrustment did not differ based on resident sex on a multi-intuitional scale; however, at a single site, there was a difference; suggesting there are multi-factorial issues contributing to differences in training.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?