Abstract:Importance: Understanding gender differences in electronic health record (EHR) use among surgeons is crucial for addressing potential disparities in workload, compensation, and physician well-being. Objective: To investigate gender differences in EHR usage patterns. Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study examined data from an EHR system (Epic Signal) at a single academic hospital from January to December 2022. Participants included 224 attending surgeons with patient encounters in the outpatient setting. Statistical analysis was performed from May 2023 to April 2024. Exposures: Surgeon's gender. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome variables were progress note length, documentation length, time spent in medical records, and time spent documenting patient encounters. Continuous variables were summarized with median and IQR and assessed via the Kruskal-Wallis test. Categorical variables were summarized using proportion and frequency and compared using the χ2 test. Multivariate linear regression was used with primary EHR usage variables as dependent variables and surgeon characteristics as independent variables. Results: This study included 222 529 patient encounters by 224 attending surgeons, of whom 68 (30%) were female and 156 (70%) were male. The median (IQR) time in practice was 14.0 (7.8-24.3) years. Male surgeons had more median (IQR) appointments per month (78.3 [39.2-130.6] vs 57.8 [25.7-89.8]; P = .005) and completed more medical records per month compared with female surgeons (43.0 [21.8-103.9] vs 29.1 [15.9-48.1]; P = .006). While there was no difference in median (IQR) time spent in the EHR system per month (664.1 [301.0-1299.1] vs 635.0 [315.6-1192.0] minutes; P = .89), female surgeons spent more time logged into the system both outside of 7am to 7pm (36.4 [7.8-67.6] vs 14.1 [5.4-52.2] min/mo; P = .05) and outside of scheduled clinic hours (134.8 [58.9-310.1] vs 105.2 [40.8-214.3] min/mo; P = .05). Female surgeons spent more median (IQR) time per note (4.8 [2.6-7.1] vs 2.5 [0.9-4.2] minutes; P < .001) compared with male surgeons. Male surgeons had a higher number of median (IQR) days logged in per month (17.7 [13.8-21.3] vs 15.7 [10.7-19.7] days; P = .03). Female surgeons wrote longer median (IQR) inpatient progress notes (6025.1 [3692.1-7786.7] vs 4307.7 [2808.9-5868.4] characters/note; P = .001) and had increased outpatient document length (6321.1 [4079.9-7825.0] vs 4445.3 [2934.7-6176.7] characters/note; P < .001). Additionally, female surgeons wrote a higher fraction of the notes manually (17% vs 12%; P = .006). After using multivariable linear regression models, male gender was associated with reduced character length for both documentations (regression coefficient, -1106.9 [95% CI, -1981.5 to -232.3]; P = .01) and progress notes (regression coefficient, -1119.0 [95% CI, -1974.1 to -263.9]; P = .01). Male gender was positively associated with total hospital medical records completed (regression coefficient, 47.3 [95% CI, 28.3-66.3]; P < .001). There was no difference associated with gender for time spent in each note, time spent outside of 7 am to 7 pm, or time spent outside scheduled clinic hours. Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional study of EHR data found that female surgeons spent more time documenting patient encounters, wrote longer notes, and spent more time in the EHR system compared with male surgeons. These findings have important implications for understanding the differential burdens faced by female surgeons, including potential contributions to burnout and payment disparities.

Gender Differences in Autonomy and Performance Assessments in a National Cohort of Vascular Surgery Trainees

Gender Differences in Operative Autonomy Using the Surgical Autonomy Program: A Multicenter Study

Gender Differences in Clinical Performance Assessment of Internal Medicine Residents: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Influence of Faculty and Trainee Gender

Exploring Gender Bias in Cardiovascular Medical Education Through Clinical Simulation

Association of Gender and Operative Feedback Quality in Surgical Residents

Resident Operative Autonomy in Robotic Surgery Training: Unpacking Gender Disparities and Training Trends

Competence over confidence: uncovering lower self-efficacy for women residents during central venous catheterization training

Empathy, well-being, and mental health: do gender differences diminish by the end of medical school?

Does gender affect experiences in the operating room for surgeons and anesthesiologists at a large academic center?

Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study

Perceptions on gender disparity in surgery and surgical leadership: A multicenter mixed methods study

Gender Differences in Work-Based Assessment Scores and Narrative Comments After Direct Observation

Overcoming Gender Bias in Assessment of Surgical Skills

Gender disparities in cardiothoracic surgery: a comparative study in India

A Comprehensive Analysis of Leadership Attributes, Discrepancies, and Implications for Gender Equity in Vascular Surgery

Association of Surgeon Self-Reported Gender and Surgical Outcomes in Current U.S. Practice

Multi-institutional Study Examining Intraoperative Entrustment and Resident Sex

Surgical experiences of final-year undergraduates and the impact on their career aspiration stratified by sex/gender

Gender Differences in Electronic Health Record Usage Among Surgeons

Perception of shared learning environment differs between vascular surgery and general surgery residents

430 Academic Productivity of Neurosurgical Trainees Is Associated With Productivity of Gender Concordant Faculty