Integrated Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Remediation of Contaminated Agricultural Soil in China

Yuanliang Jin,Liuwei Wang,Yinan Song,Jin Zhu,Muhan Qin,Longhua Wu,Pengjie Hu,Fangbai Li,Liping Fang,Chang Chen,Deyi Hou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02535

2021-08-09

Abstract:Agricultural land degradation is posing a serious threat to global food security. Restoration of the degraded land has traditionally been viewed as an inherently sustainable practice; however, restoration processes render consequential environmental impacts which could potentially exceed the benefit of restoration itself. In the present study, an integrated life cycle assessment analysis was conducted to evaluate life cycle primary, secondary, and tertiary impacts associated with the restoration of the contaminated agricultural land. The results demonstrated the importance of including spatially differentiated impacts associated with managing the land and growing crops. Comparing four risk management scenarios at a contaminated field in Southern China, it was found that the primary and secondary impacts followed the order of no action > chemical stabilization > phytoextraction > alternative planting. However, when tertiary impacts were taken into account, alternative planting rendered much higher footprint in comparison with phytoextraction and chemical stabilization, which provides evidence against an emerging notion held by some policy makers. Furthermore, assuming that the loss of the rice paddy field in Southern China is compensated by the deforested land in the Amazon rainforest, the total global environmental impact would far exceed that of no action, resulting in 687 ton CO2-e ha–1 of climate change impact. Overall, the present study provides new research findings to support more holistic policy making and also sheds lights on the future development of various restoration technologies.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c02535.Calculation of CSM and related assumptions, system boundary and life cycle inventory of different modeled scenarios, methods involved in calculation of impacts, sensitivity analysis results, other information, and results of two additional modeled scenarios (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores how to assess the lifecycle environmental impact during the remediation of polluted farmland in China and seeks sustainable remediation strategies. Specifically, the study attempts to address the following key issues:

1. **Assessing the overall environmental benefits of remediation work**: The study aims to determine whether the benefits brought by remediation activities outweigh their negative impacts over their lifecycle, i.e., to judge whether the remediation activities meet the "minimum" sustainability standards.

2. **Competitive advantage analysis of different remediation technologies**: Through comprehensive evaluation, the study aims to identify the key factors that determine the competitive advantages of various remediation technologies, thereby providing guidance for future technological development directions.

3. **Tertiary impacts of converting agricultural production systems**: When agricultural land is converted for other uses (e.g., from rice paddies to other crops), a series of indirect environmental impacts may occur, known as "tertiary impacts." The study aims to quantify the changes in environmental footprint that such conversions might bring.

To achieve the above objectives, the study adopts an integrated lifecycle assessment method to comprehensively consider the primary, secondary, and tertiary impacts of remediation activities. Primary impacts refer to the original pollution conditions at the remediation site; secondary impacts involve the environmental effects of the remediation activities themselves; and tertiary impacts include the indirect effects brought by the post-remediation land reuse. By comparing four risk management scenarios (taking no action, chemical stabilization, phytoremediation, and alternative planting), the study finds that when only primary and secondary impacts are considered, alternative planting seems to be the optimal choice; however, once tertiary impacts are included, the environmental footprint of the alternative planting scheme significantly increases, which contradicts the views of some policymakers. Additionally, the study simulates that if the lost rice paddy area in southern China is compensated by deforestation in the Amazon rainforest, it would lead to a substantial increase in global environmental impact, far exceeding the scenario of taking no action.

In summary, this study provides new research findings for the formulation of more comprehensive policies and offers insights into the future development directions of various remediation technologies.