Abstract:Since intensive farming practices are essential to produce enough food for the increasing population in China, farmers have been using more inorganic fertilizers and pesticides. In addition, rural areas were heavily populated and a large number of domestic sewage were discharged widespread. Agricultural land and residential land are two of the major sources of nonpoint source pollution. However, by changing farming practices in terms of tillage and reducing the fertilizer rate as well as improving domestic sewage treatments, the levels of contamination can be reduced and the quality of soil and water resources can be improved. Thus, there is a need to investigate the hydrologic effects on nutrient loss when various watershed managements are operated in tandem. In this study, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was utilized to evaluate the individual and combined impacts of various management practices on total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) loads in the Changle River watershed. The model was calibrated and validated using the years 2004-2007 and 2008-2009 data sets, respectively. The simulated results revealed that the SWAT model provided a good simulation performance. For those tested watershed management scenarios, no-tillage (NT) offered more environmental benefits than moldboard plowing. In terms of reducing fertilizer rate or treating domestic sewage, they were also able to obviously reduce TN and TP loads. When the combined effects of the three practices were examined, it was found that the scenario of NT and reducing fertilizer rate by 30% without domestic sewage inputs could greatly restrain the loss of nutrients to waters and basically met the II grade water quality target, meanwhile it was also the best management practice that could be easily accepted by local farmers and government.

Predicting The Impact Of Management Practices On River Water Quality Using Swat In An Agricultural Watershed