Assessment of site contaminated soil remediation based on an input output life cycle assessment

Chang Chen,Xuemei Zhang,Jiaao Chen,Fangyuan Chen,Jiahao Li,Yuchi Chen,Haobo Hou,Feng shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121422
IF: 11.1
2020-08-01
Journal of Cleaner Production
Abstract:<p>Soil pollution is expanding, and soil remediation projects are underway around the world. To make the soil remediation more sustainable, soil remediation project impact assessments have been developed. In this study, the input-output life cycle assessment (IO-LCA) method is used to quantify the environmental, social, and economic impacts of four soil remediation schemes based on three soil remediation techniques (in situ encapsulation (ISE), ex situ thermal desorption (ESTD), and in situ thermal desorption (ISTD)) in an industrial contaminated area of China. The evaluation results showed that the ISE technology was the technology with the lowest cost and the best environmental impact, but it is only suitable for deep contaminated soils. ISTD was the best technique for a comprehensive evaluation. ISE + ESTD were the most suitable alternatives for a project. These evaluation methods will allow soil remediation decision makers to make informed choices. Soil remediation projects can be optimized by selecting appropriate energy sources and reducing NO<sub>X</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> emissions from natural gas supplies.</p>
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly discusses the problem of quantifying the environmental, social, and economic impacts of four soil remediation schemes based on the Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment (IO-LCA) method. The study focuses on an industrial pollution area in China and uses three soil remediation technologies: in-situ encapsulation (ISE), in-situ thermal desorption (ISTD), and ex-situ thermal desorption (ESTD). The results show that ISE technology has the lowest cost and the least environmental impact, but it is only suitable for deep soil pollution. ISTD performs the best in comprehensive evaluation, while ISE+ESTD is the most suitable alternative. These assessment methods can help decision-makers make informed choices for soil remediation by selecting appropriate energy sources and reducing NOx and SO2 emissions in natural gas supply to optimize remediation projects. The paper emphasizes the sustainability of soil remediation, especially in the chemical industry pollution aspect, and points out that the IO-LCA method can comprehensively evaluate the environmental, social, and economic benefits of soil remediation projects.