Design of wind-turbine blades for improving aerodynamic performance using hybrid blades

Shun-Chang Yen,Wei-Shen Liu,Kuo-Ching San,Wei-Fan Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108889

IF: 5

2021-05-01

Ocean Engineering

Abstract:<p>The blade airfoil significantly influences the performance of wind turbine. This study designs a new hybrid blade airfoil (abbreviated as HBA) based on the previous airfoils (S809 and NACA 63215). The surface-flow modes, wake-flow characteristics, and aerodynamic performance of HBA were tested using various Reynolds numbers and angles of attack. The experimental methods involved (1) the smoke-wire visualization at low wind speeds, (2) the surface-oil flow visualization at high wind speeds, (3) the hot-wire anemometry, and (4) the six force–moment balancer. At blade stall, the lift coefficient of 2.12 for HBA is approximately twice that of 1.07 for S809 and NACA63215. The maximum lift–drag ratio of 6.11 for HBA is approximately twice those (3.63 and 3.13) of S809 and NACA 63215. Moreover, the HBA has a higher stall angle than those of the other two blades. The (pitch) moment coefficient of HBA is also higher than those of S809 and NACA 63215.</p>

engineering, civil, ocean, marine,oceanography

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to address the issue of aerodynamic performance optimization for wind turbine blades. Specifically, the researchers designed a new Hybrid Blade Airfoil (HBA) aimed at improving the aerodynamic performance of wind turbine blades by combining the characteristics of the existing S809 and NACA 63215 airfoils.

### Main Issues
1. **Increase in Lift Coefficient**: The lift coefficient of the newly designed HBA airfoil reached 2.12 during blade stall, almost twice that of the S809 and NACA 63215 airfoils (both 1.07).
2. **Increase in Lift-to-Drag Ratio**: The maximum lift-to-drag ratio of HBA is 6.11, almost twice that of S809 (3.63) and NACA 63215 (3.13).
3. **Increase in Stall Angle**: The stall angle of HBA is higher than that of the other two airfoils, meaning it can maintain good aerodynamic performance at higher angles of attack.
4. **Increase in Moment Coefficient**: The moment coefficient of HBA is also higher than that of S809 and NACA 63215, indicating better performance in torque control.

### Research Methods
To test the performance of HBA, the researchers employed various experimental methods:
1. **Smoke Line Visualization**: Observing surface flow patterns at low wind speeds.
2. **Surface Oil Flow Visualization**: Observing surface flow patterns at high wind speeds.
3. **Hot-Wire Anemometry**: Detecting wake characteristics.
4. **Six-Component Force-Moment Balance**: Measuring aerodynamic forces and moments.

### Experimental Results
1. **Surface Flow Patterns**: HBA exhibited various surface flow patterns under different Reynolds numbers and angles of attack, including surface boundary layer separation, near-leading-edge separation, and bluff body wake.
2. **Wake Characteristics**: The turbulence intensity of HBA's wake varied with the angle of attack, showing bluff body effects at high angles of attack.
3. **Aerodynamic Performance**: HBA outperformed S809 and NACA 63215 in terms of lift coefficient, lift-to-drag ratio, and moment coefficient.

### Conclusion
By designing and testing the new HBA airfoil, the researchers successfully improved the aerodynamic performance of wind turbine blades, achieving significant improvements in lift coefficient, lift-to-drag ratio, and stall angle. These results provide important references for the future design of wind turbine blades.