Abstract:Despite some discomfort with this grandly philosophical topic, I do in fact hope to address a venerable pair of philosophical chestnuts: mathematical truth and existence. My plan is to set out three possible stands on these issues, for an exercise in compare and contrast. A word of warning, though, to philosophical purists (and perhaps of comfort to more mathematical readers): I will explore these philosophical positions with an eye to their interconnections with some concrete issues of set theoretic method. Let me begin with a brief look at what to count as ‘philosophy’. To some extent, this is a matter of usage, and mathematicians sometimes classify as ‘philosophical’ any considerations other than outright proofs. So, for example, discussions of the propriety of particular mathematical methods would fall under this heading: should we prefer analytic or synthetic approaches in geometry? Should elliptic functions be treated in terms of explicit representations (as in Weierstrass) or geometrically (as in Riemann)? Should we allow impredicative definitions? Should we restrict ourselves to a logic without bivalence or the law of the excluded middle? Also included in this category would be the trains of thought that shaped our central concepts: should a function always be defined by a formula? Should a group be required to have an inverse for every element? Should ideal divisors be defined contextually or explicitly, treated computationally or abstractly? In addition, there are more general questions concerning mathematical values, aims and goals: Should we strive for powerful theories or low-risk theories? How much stress should be placed on the fact or promise of physical applications? How important are interconnections between the various branches of mathematics? These philosophical questions of method naturally include several peculiar to set theory: should set theorists focus their efforts on drawing consequences for areas of interest to mathematicians outside mathematical logic? Should exploration of the standard axioms of ZFC be preferred to the exploration and exploitation of new axioms? How should axioms for set theory be chosen? What would a solution to the Continuum Problem look like?

On the difficulties of acquiring mathematical experience: Case rural education

Problem‐solving or knowledge‐centred: the influence of philosophy on mathematics teaching

Teaching mathematics with a different philosophy. Part 1: Formal mathematics as biased metaphysics

Teaching Writing and Communication in a Mathematical Modeling Course

Some Thoughts on the Teaching of Mathematics -- ten years later

Examining the Mathematics in Mathematics Teacher Education

Mathematics-for-Teaching: an Ongoing Investigation of the Mathematics that Teachers (Need to) Know

What is Mathematics? Perspectives Inspired by Anthropology

Mathematical Existence

Assumption Digging in Euclidean Geometry

Mathematics in the lower primary years: A research-based perspective on curricula and teaching practice

What do mathematicians wish to teach teachers about the discipline of mathematics?

Constructive mathematics and teaching

Paving the cowpath in research within pure mathematics: A medium level model based on text driven variations

Epistemological obstacles in mathematical abstraction on abstract algebra

The significance of mathematical knowledge in teaching elementary methods courses: perspectives of mathematics teacher educators

Bridging knowing and proving in mathematics An essay from a didactical perspective

Mathematics For Industry: A Personal Perspective

Mathematicians ’ : The Divisions of Pre-Modern Mathematics and Its Actors Summary

Mathematical Modeling: Issues and Challenges in Mathematics Education and Teaching

Epistemological Notes on Mathematics