Abstract:Despite some discomfort with this grandly philosophical topic, I do in fact hope to address a venerable pair of philosophical chestnuts: mathematical truth and existence. My plan is to set out three possible stands on these issues, for an exercise in compare and contrast. A word of warning, though, to philosophical purists (and perhaps of comfort to more mathematical readers): I will explore these philosophical positions with an eye to their interconnections with some concrete issues of set theoretic method. Let me begin with a brief look at what to count as ‘philosophy’. To some extent, this is a matter of usage, and mathematicians sometimes classify as ‘philosophical’ any considerations other than outright proofs. So, for example, discussions of the propriety of particular mathematical methods would fall under this heading: should we prefer analytic or synthetic approaches in geometry? Should elliptic functions be treated in terms of explicit representations (as in Weierstrass) or geometrically (as in Riemann)? Should we allow impredicative definitions? Should we restrict ourselves to a logic without bivalence or the law of the excluded middle? Also included in this category would be the trains of thought that shaped our central concepts: should a function always be defined by a formula? Should a group be required to have an inverse for every element? Should ideal divisors be defined contextually or explicitly, treated computationally or abstractly? In addition, there are more general questions concerning mathematical values, aims and goals: Should we strive for powerful theories or low-risk theories? How much stress should be placed on the fact or promise of physical applications? How important are interconnections between the various branches of mathematics? These philosophical questions of method naturally include several peculiar to set theory: should set theorists focus their efforts on drawing consequences for areas of interest to mathematicians outside mathematical logic? Should exploration of the standard axioms of ZFC be preferred to the exploration and exploitation of new axioms? How should axioms for set theory be chosen? What would a solution to the Continuum Problem look like?

Constructive mathematics and teaching

Constructive Mathematics

In Accordance with a “More Majestic Order”: The New Math and the Nature of Mathematics at Midcentury

Teaching mathematics with a different philosophy. Part 1: Formal mathematics as biased metaphysics

Knowledge Construction and Diverging Thinking in Elementary & Advanced Mathematics

Problem‐solving or knowledge‐centred: the influence of philosophy on mathematics teaching

Pointfree topology and constructive mathematics

Hard Proofs and Good Reasons

What is Mathematics? Perspectives Inspired by Anthropology

A memory theoretic approach for investigating the roles of language and intuition in mathematical thinking activities

Constructive Projective Geometry

Mathematics Learning and Teaching Directed to Process Construction

On teaching mathematics to gifted students: some enrichment ideas and educational activities

Mathematics-for-Teaching: an Ongoing Investigation of the Mathematics that Teachers (Need to) Know

Bridging knowing and proving in mathematics An essay from a didactical perspective

Mathematics and society reunited: The social aspects of Brouwer's intuitionism

"We Think That We Think Clearly, But That's Only Because We Don't Think Clearly": Mathematics, Mind, and the Human World

Some Thoughts on the Teaching of Mathematics -- ten years later

Constructing the Constructible Universe Constructively

What do mathematicians wish to teach teachers about the discipline of mathematics?

Mathematical Existence