Structural Insight into the Abnormal Capacity of a Co-Substituted Tunnel-Type Na 0.44 MnO 2 Cathode for Sodium-Ion Batteries

Wentao Zhong,Qianhui Huang,Fenghua Zheng,Qiang Deng,Qichang Pan,Yanzhen Liu,Youpeng Li,Yijuan Li,Junhua Hu,Chenghao Yang,Meilin Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c13278
2020-09-29
Abstract:Tunnel-type (T-type) Na<sub>0.44</sub>MnO<sub>2</sub> (NMO) is a promising cathode material for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) owing to its high rate performance and cycling stability compared to manganese-based layered oxides. However, the low specific capacity still restricts its practical applications. Herein, a Co-doped T-type NMO is synthesized through a facile solid-state reaction method and utilized as a cathode material for SIBs. A T-type Na<sub>0.44</sub>Mn<sub>0.9925</sub>Co<sub>0.0075</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (NMO-3) electrode can deliver a high reversible capacity of 138 mAh g<sup>–1</sup> at 0.1C, a superior rate capability (133, 130, 121, 106, and 93 mAh g<sup>–1</sup> at 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10C, respectively), and excellent cycling stability (85.2% at 10C after 500 cycles). The substitution of Co<sup>3+</sup> by Mn<sup>3+</sup> leads to the enlargement of small and S-shaped tunnel spaces, which facilitates the insertion/deinsertion of Na<sup>+</sup> into/from NMO-3 and greatly enhances its rate capability and cycling stability. Moreover, the reduced energy barriers for Na<sup>+</sup> diffusion in small tunnels make the inactive Na<sup>+</sup> easier to be deintercalated, which should be responsible for its high specific capacity that exceeds the theoretical capacity of T-type NMO.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c13278?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c13278</a>.XRD patterns and Rietveld refinement plot (Figure S1); XPS patterns of Mn 2p and Co 2p (Figure S2); SEM, TEM, and HRTEM images (Figure S3); CV curves (Figure S4); charge–discharge profile of the initial three cycles (Figure S5); CV curves at different scanning rates (Figure S6); SEM images after 100, 300, and 500 cycles (Figure S7); Nyquist plots before and after cycling (Figure S8); evolution of lattice parameters obtained by in situ XRD (Figure S9); assembly drawing of the in situ XRD cell (Figure S10); formation energies with different Co-substitution contents (Figure S11); structure evolutions and energy barriers (Figure S12); TEM-HAADF and TEM-EDX element mapping images at a fully charged state (Figure 13); electronic conductivities (Figure S14); lattice parameters from Rietveld refinement (Table S1); ICP-OES (Table S2); content of Mn<sup>3+</sup> and Mn<sup>4+</sup> (Table S3); dissolution degree of Mn after cycling (Table S4); impedance parameters before cycling (Table S5); impedance parameters after cycling (Table S6); comparison of electrochemical properties (Table S7); and potential of redox peaks by CV curves (Table S8) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.0c13278/suppl_file/am0c13278_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?