Prospective evaluation of the safety of ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks using the in-plane technique

John-Paul B Etheridge,Roderick J Finlayson,Jan Venter,Frederik De Villiers,Jonathan P Etheridge,Reece Wakefield,Arraya Watanitanon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105296
2024-03-19
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
Abstract:Background While fluoroscopic guidance is currently the imaging standard for cervical medial branch blocks (CMBBs), ultrasound guidance (USG) offers several potential safety advantages such as real-time needle visualization and the ability to detect and avoid critical soft tissue vascular or neural structures. However, no large-scale trials have examined the safety of USG for CMBB. Methods Five hundred patients undergoing 2308 individual block levels were recruited using a prospective cohort design, and blocks were performed in an outpatient office setting using an in-plane USG technique. Primary outcomes included immediate block-related complication, as well as delayed occurrences, in the following 2 weeks. Vascular structures adjacent to the target area, as well as the occurrence of vascular breach, were recorded. Results Three minor immediate complications were noted (two subcutaneous hematomas, one vasovagal reaction) comprising 0.13% of blocks (0.03% to 0.38%; 95% two-sided CI), and no delayed events were recorded (0% to 0.16%; 97.5% one-sided CI). Blood vessels were detected and avoided in 8.2% of blocks, and vascular breach was noted in 0.52% of blocks (0.27% to 0.91%; 95% two-sided CI). Conclusion When performed using an in-plane technique by experienced operators, USG CMBB was found to be safe, with rare minor immediate complications and no further adverse event reported in the following 2 weeks. Trial registration number NCT04852393 .
anesthesiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?