Septische Kardiomyopathie – Diagnostik und Schweregradabschätzung

Ursula Müller-Werdan,Alexander Vogt,Karl Werdan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01109-z

2024-02-13

Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin

Abstract:Die septische Kardiomyopathie (sKM) wird in ihrer Relevanz häufig unterschätzt. Die Unterschätzung basiert auf der komplexen Schädigung des Herzens und der Schwierigkeit, den Schweregrad der Funktionseinschränkung zu quantifizieren.

medicine, general & internal

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the paper attempts to solve

This paper aims to solve the problem of insufficient diagnosis and severity assessment of **septic cardiomyopathy (sKM)**. Specifically:

1. **Background problems**:
- The importance of septic cardiomyopathy is often underestimated, mainly due to the complexity of the cardiac injury pattern and the difficulty in quantifying the degree of dysfunction.
- Traditional diagnostic methods such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), SOFA score, electrocardiogram (ECG) and cardiac biomarkers are not effective in assessing the severity of septic cardiomyopathy.

2. **Research objectives**:
- **Describe diagnostic methods**: Introduce methods for diagnosing septic cardiomyopathy.
- **Evaluate severity**: Explore how to accurately assess the severity of septic cardiomyopathy.

3. **Main findings**:
- Septic cardiomyopathy is manifested not only as systolic and diastolic dysfunction of the left ventricle, but also involves the right ventricle, accompanied by sinus tachycardia (≥90 - 95 beats/minute).
- Traditional parameters such as LVEF, SOFA score, ECG and cardiac biomarkers cannot effectively assess its severity.
- **Complex echocardiographic diagnosis** or measurement considering global cardiac function parameters that are post - load - dependent is necessary.
- Specifically mentioned is "Afterload - related cardiac performance" (ACP), which assesses cardiac function by comparing the cardiac output of patients with that of a healthy heart under the same decrease in vascular resistance.

4. **Conclusions**:
- Simple parameters such as LVEF are not suitable for the diagnosis or severity classification of septic cardiomyopathy.
- More complex techniques such as echocardiography or post - load - independent parameters (especially ACP measurement) are more appropriate choices.

### Formula representation

- **ACP (Afterload - related cardiac performance)**:
\[
ACP=\left(\frac{HZV_{\text{septic}}}{HZV_{\text{healthy}}}\right)\times100\%
\]
where:
- \(HZV_{\text{septic}}\) is the stroke volume (Cardiac Output) of septic patients.
- \(HZV_{\text{healthy}}\) is the stroke volume of a healthy heart under the same decrease in systemic vascular resistance (SVR).

Through these methods, the paper hopes to improve the understanding and diagnostic accuracy of septic cardiomyopathy, thereby improving the treatment effect and prognosis of patients.