Discussion on "Fragility curves for assessment of seismic vulnerability of buildings on slopes" by Magapu and Setia, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 173 (2023) 108069

Vaibhav Sharma,Dhiraj Raj,M. Bharathi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108460
IF: 4
2024-02-08
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Abstract:The authors [1] have stated that, as per IS: 1893(Part I)-2016 [6], the effective peak ground acceleration (EPGA) in the Sikkim region is 0.24g for the Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE). It is quite confusing for the reader, as IS: 1893(Part I)-2016 code provides no information regarding the EPGA and MCE. The authors [1] have mentioned that an earthquake with 6.9 magnitude and 0.18g PGA was measured in Gangtok as per IS: 1893. However, no such information is found in any version of IS: 1893. It is difficult for the reader to understand the incomplete sentence in the original manuscript, which states, "A numerical study on the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete frame buildings situated on hill slopes." Further, from the statement, "A detailed survey to develop a building stock inventory in Uttarakhand, India concluded that 60 % of the buildings were low-rise and mid-rise reinforced concrete structures where code provisions were violated. The slope angle of these buildings ranged between 15° and 30°, and the maximum number of floors was four", it is not clear that who has conducted this study, proper citation is required.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,engineering, geological
What problem does this paper attempt to address?