3DEC Simulations of Dynamic Direct Shear Tests Considering Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC)

B. H. Kim,M. K. Larson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56952/arma-2023-0014
2023-06-25
Abstract:In general, the dynamic properties, e.g., dynamic rock modulus and dynamic rock (shear or tensile) strength are two to three times greater than static moduli and strengths. Thus, understanding the dynamic rock characteristics is necessary to improve the design of support systems in underground mines, nearly all of which are subject to dynamic loading. In this paper, we report the baseline results of an ongoing study. Experimental direct shear tests were conducted on jointed specimens that were created by 3D printer to represent 3D joint roughness coefficients (JRCs) of 12 and 17. These JRC values are relatively close, but they represent the roughness of a large proportion of joints found in underground mines. We also report the results of numerical direct shear tests using 3DEC modeling code that were conducted for the purpose of learning more about dynamic shear failure mechanisms. We performed static direct shear tests for the purpose of calibrating our models with the empirical solution. Results of these tests compared well with the empirical results. Subsequent dynamic numerical direct shear tests were performed using 3DEC, simulating the dynamic direct shear tests performed in the laboratory. The numerical direct shear stresses compared well with those of the laboratory tests. Furthermore, the results confirm that the ratio of dynamic to static shear strengths vary between approximately 2 and 3 in the range of normal stresses used in the tests. Dynamic failure in coal mines, known as "bursts" or "bumps," is one of the most challenging and persistent engineering problems associated with coal mining in highly stressed conditions. These events occur when stresses in a coal pillar, used for support in underground workings, exceed the critical strength of the pillar, causing the pillar to rupture without warning. These events can be exceptionally violent, ejecting coal and rock with explosive force [1, 2]. These events occur suddenly and often without warning. As such, miners often do not have the opportunity to move to safety before an event. Although relatively rare, dynamic failure events resulted in worker injury up to and including fatality in 52% of the reported cases occurring from 2000–2019. Moreover, the fatality rate is roughly ten times greater than that associated with roof falls, a leading cause of ground-control-related injuries in underground coal mines [3]. The risk associated with faults/fault zones and coal bumps has been acknowledged by several researchers in the literature. Mauck [4] and Peperakis [5] mention the risk of bumps with regard to the proximity of mining operations to faults. Some describe the role of faults in stress concentration [5-9], thus causing conditions with increased bursts/bumps risk. Others specifically mention fault slip and the resulting release of energy associated with bursts/bumps [5, 7-10].
Engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?