Abstract:Despite being of undisputed importance, there is no consensus on what emotions are, with the majority of research that constructs ideas about them being colored by a particular worldview. This conceptual article examines the case for conducting an Islamic analysis of emotion. It might seem a peculiar area to examine; what would be the need to analyze such a universal psychological concept through the lens of a particular religion? Three points are used to argue for this endeavor. To begin with, this article highlights the relative instability of the term; there is yet no universally agreed upon definition of what emotions are, and which human processes they contribute to. As the concept is still being defined, there is merit in engaging with the discussion, particularly given the relative absence of metaphysics from the debate. Secondly, specificities relating to emotions and how they have conceptualized are considered. This section delves into the way in which variable factors, such as culture, language, and worldview, influence how emotions manifest. The overarching point argued for here is that how emotions are experienced, and even which emotions are experienced, are shaped by factors that are not consistent across time and space. Accordingly, different worldviews will formulate different "emotional palates" and "emotional ideologies"; different groups of people will understand and engage with emotions differently. Thirdly, a broader discussion ensues pertaining to the nature of science, psychology, and their relationship with secularity. This discussion includes critique of the idea that forces such as secularism and scientific materialism have been "discovered" and are therefore value-neutral. Accordingly, understandings of emotions to have emerged from the Academy, and contemporary psychology, are value-laden. This section also looks at the origins of science in order to determine whether it is inherently atheistic or areligious, and therefore antagonistic to a religious worldview. The section also challenges the apparent secularity of psychology and key psychologists. A range of other facets pertaining to how the emotions have been conceptualized, such as their relational core, their interaction with moral faculties, and their enmeshment with what is important to individuals and groups, are also considered.

Reason without feelings? Emotions in the history of western philosophy

Emotions in Philosophy. A Short Introduction

Passionate rationalism: the role of emotion in decision making

The Logic of Emotional Experience: Noninferentiality and the Problem of Conflict Without Contradiction

Medieval Sciences of Emotions during the Eleventh to Thirteenth Centuries: An Intellectual History

II. The Emotions and their Philosophy of Mind

Concepts of Emotions in Modern Philosophy and Psychology

A Philosophical Interpretation of Emotion in Traditional Chinese Arts

What Are Emotions About?

A concept in flux and starved of the metaphysical: desecularizing emotion

Medicine, emotience, and reason

Law, Reason, and Emotion

The Politics of Emotions in International Relations: Who Gets to Feel What, Whose Emotions Matter, and the “History Problem” in Sino-Japanese Relations

Do emotions play an essential role in moral judgments?

Joy, Sorrow, Wrath: Some Considerations over the Byzantine People’s Emotionality in Literary Sources

Books: The History of Emotions: A Very Short Introduction

Reason in the History of Philosophy: One and Many

Dilemma of Moral Dilemmas:The Conflict Between Emotion and Reasoning in Moral Judgments

When is lack of emotion a problem for justice? Four views on legal decision makers’ emotive life

Emotion Theory and Research: Highlights, Unanswered Questions, and Emerging Issues

Nietzsche on Human Emotions