Abstract:Despite being of undisputed importance, there is no consensus on what emotions are, with the majority of research that constructs ideas about them being colored by a particular worldview. This conceptual article examines the case for conducting an Islamic analysis of emotion. It might seem a peculiar area to examine; what would be the need to analyze such a universal psychological concept through the lens of a particular religion? Three points are used to argue for this endeavor. To begin with, this article highlights the relative instability of the term; there is yet no universally agreed upon definition of what emotions are, and which human processes they contribute to. As the concept is still being defined, there is merit in engaging with the discussion, particularly given the relative absence of metaphysics from the debate. Secondly, specificities relating to emotions and how they have conceptualized are considered. This section delves into the way in which variable factors, such as culture, language, and worldview, influence how emotions manifest. The overarching point argued for here is that how emotions are experienced, and even which emotions are experienced, are shaped by factors that are not consistent across time and space. Accordingly, different worldviews will formulate different "emotional palates" and "emotional ideologies"; different groups of people will understand and engage with emotions differently. Thirdly, a broader discussion ensues pertaining to the nature of science, psychology, and their relationship with secularity. This discussion includes critique of the idea that forces such as secularism and scientific materialism have been "discovered" and are therefore value-neutral. Accordingly, understandings of emotions to have emerged from the Academy, and contemporary psychology, are value-laden. This section also looks at the origins of science in order to determine whether it is inherently atheistic or areligious, and therefore antagonistic to a religious worldview. The section also challenges the apparent secularity of psychology and key psychologists. A range of other facets pertaining to how the emotions have been conceptualized, such as their relational core, their interaction with moral faculties, and their enmeshment with what is important to individuals and groups, are also considered.

Concepts of Emotions in Modern Philosophy and Psychology

II. The Emotions and their Philosophy of Mind

Emotions in Philosophy. A Short Introduction

Emotion Theory and Research: Highlights, Unanswered Questions, and Emerging Issues

Do we need to reconceptualize emotions?

A concept in flux and starved of the metaphysical: desecularizing emotion

William James, the Nature of Knowledge, and Current Issues in Emotion, Cognition, and Communication

The Cognition-Emotion Debate: A Bit of History

Reason without feelings? Emotions in the history of western philosophy

The Many Meanings/Aspects of Emotion: Definitions, Functions, Activation, and Regulation

Emotion in a Century: A Review of Emotion Recognition

Solving the Emotion Paradox: Categorization and the Experience of Emotion

On <i>The brain and emotion</i>

Emotion: the Self-regulatory Sense

What Are Emotions About?

Historical pitfalls and new directions in the neuroscience of emotion

Perspectives from affective science on understanding the nature of emotion

The rise of affectivism

The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review

Current Emotion Research in Social Psychology: Thinking About Emotions and Other People

On The Brain And Emotion