Diagnostic Discrepancies in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study

Laurens A. Schols,Myrthe E. Maranus,Pleunie P.M. Rood,Laura Zwaan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000001252
2024-07-18
Journal of Patient Safety
Abstract:In the emergency department (ED), physicians make diagnoses for many patients each day. This process is, however, not flawless. Sometimes, the diagnosis does not match with the actual disease. This is not always the result of a diagnostic error but can also occur because of the evolution of the disease. 1 However, sometimes, they reflect diagnostic errors. Diagnostic errors are defined as a missed, delayed, or wrong diagnosis determined by later performed definitive tests or findings. 2 Diagnostic errors are not uncommon and estimated to occur in 5–15% of the patients. 3,4 In the field of patient safety, diagnostic errors have an increasingly prominent role, 5 because they have more severe consequences than other error types. 6 Especially the ED is prone to diagnostic errors, due to the high workload, the high levels of uncertainty and the urgency in which decisions have to be made. 7,8 However, to date, relatively little research has been conducted directly assessing diagnostic quality in EDs. 9,10 Previous research that was conducted showed a substantial difference between diagnosis at admittance and the discharge diagnosis in 12.3% of the patients who visited the ED and were subsequently admitted to the hospital. 11 These so-called diagnostic discrepancies were significantly associated with a longer hospital stay as well as higher mortality rates. The relatively high number of diagnostic discrepancies and their possible consequences raise the question whether this finding is consistent and generalizable to other countries and subsequently what we can learn from those discrepancies to improve the diagnostic process.
health care sciences & services,health policy & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?