Abstract:Background: Atypical presentations have been increasingly recognized as a significant contributing factor to diagnostic errors in internal medicine. However, research to address associations between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors has not been evaluated due to the lack of widely applicable definitions and criteria for what is considered an atypical presentation. Objective: The aim of the study is to describe how atypical presentations are defined and measured in studies of diagnostic errors in internal medicine and use this new information to develop new criteria to identify atypical presentations at high risk for diagnostic errors. Methods: This study will follow an established framework for conducting scoping reviews. Inclusion criteria are developed according to the participants, concept, and context framework. This review will consider studies that fulfill all of the following criteria: include adult patients (participants); explore the association between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors using any definition, criteria, or measurement to identify atypical presentations and diagnostic errors (concept); and focus on internal medicine (context). Regarding the type of sources, this scoping review will consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods study designs; systematic reviews; and opinion papers for inclusion. Case reports, case series, and conference abstracts will be excluded. The data will be extracted through MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar searches. No limits will be applied to language, and papers indexed from database inception to December 31, 2023, will be included. Two independent reviewers (YH and RK) will conduct study selection and data extraction. The data extracted will include specific details about the patient characteristics (eg, age, sex, and disease), the definitions and measuring methods for atypical presentations and diagnostic errors, clinical settings (eg, department and outpatient or inpatient), type of evidence source, and the association between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors relevant to the review question. The extracted data will be presented in tabular format with descriptive statistics, allowing us to identify the key components or types of atypical presentations and develop new criteria to identify atypical presentations for future studies of diagnostic errors. Developing the new criteria will follow guidance for a basic qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach. Results: As of January 2024, a literature search through multiple databases is ongoing. We will complete this study by December 2024. Conclusions: This scoping review aims to provide rigorous evidence to develop new criteria to identify atypical presentations at high risk for diagnostic errors in internal medicine. Such criteria could facilitate the development of a comprehensive conceptual model to understand the associations between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors in internal medicine. Trial registration: Open Science Framework; www.osf.io/27d5m. International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/56933.

Diagnostic error in mental health: a review

The global burden of diagnostic errors in primary care

"What Else Could It Be?" A Scoping Review of Questions for Patients to Ask Throughout the Diagnostic Process

Diagnostic decision-making and strategies to improve diagnosis

Methods for and Challenges in Seeking Diagnostic Excellence

[Cognitive errors in diagnostic decision making]

Diagnostic Discrepancies in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study

Toward the eradication of medical diagnostic errors

Characteristics of Disease-Specific and Generic Diagnostic Pitfalls: A Qualitative Study

Protecting Patients by Reducing Diagnostic Error

Reflections on Diagnosis and Diagnostic Errors: a Survey of Internal Medicine Resident and Attending Physicians

Errors in Radiology: A Standard Review

Hospital commitments to address diagnostic errors: An assessment of 95 US hospitals

Definitions and Measurements for Atypical Presentations at Risk for Diagnostic Errors in Internal Medicine: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Diagnostic Errors in Hospitalized Adults Who Died or Were Transferred to Intensive Care

Prevalence and Causes of Diagnostic Errors in Hospitalized Patients Under Investigation for COVID-19

A Systematic Review on the Evidence of Misdiagnosis in Dementia and Its Impact on Accessing Dementia Care

Rate of diagnostic errors and serious misdiagnosis-related harms for major vascular events, infections, and cancers: toward a national incidence estimate using the “Big Three”

Using Patient Experience Surveys to Identify Potential Diagnostic Safety Breakdowns: A Mixed Methods Study

AI and mental health: evaluating supervised machine learning models trained on diagnostic classifications

Reducing the Risk of Diagnostic Error in the COVID-19 Era