Abstract:Background: Diagnostic excellence encompasses both receiving an accurate and timely explanation of a health problem that was communicated well, and the process it took to get to the correct diagnosis. Directly eliciting patients' perceptions of their diagnostic experience and outcomes after emergency visits is a promising method of assessing diagnostic excellence. However, little is known about how patients interpret and respond to questions about their diagnostic experiences and outcomes. Objective: To analyze patient and care partners' interpretation of questions capturing patient-reported diagnostic excellence in emergency settings. Design: Cognitive interviews using think-aloud and probing methods. Settings: Interviews were conducted virtually and via phone calls. Participants were patients or care partners of patients recently discharged from three emergency departments within a single academic health system in the Mid-Atlantic region of the US. Participants: 15 patients and care partners, 18 years or older, with recent emergency department experiences. Methods: Qualitative analysis using a deductive approach was used to code transcripts and analyze participant responses to Patient-Report to Improve Diagnostic Excellence in Emergency Department (PRIME-ED) questionnaire items. Themes of patient and care partners' questionnaire interpretations are presented descriptively. Results: 80% of participants were female, 47% were between the ages of 18-24 years, 47% of participants were White, and 7% were Hispanic/Latino. Participants shared their interpretations of diagnostic excellence following PRIME-ED domains: diagnostic accuracy and care team skills, their comprehension of the diagnosis, provider communication of uncertainty, and quality of diagnostic communication, including whether they felt the care team communicated well, adapted communication to their needs, listened and took concerns seriously, treated them as an equal, and provided clear, sufficient, and functional communication about follow-up steps. Responses indicated that patients and care partners can identify diagnostic errors, rationalize why their diagnosis was inaccurate, and assess whether diagnostic excellence was achieved. Respondents identified factors that contributed to their assessments of diagnostic accuracy and the quality of diagnostic communication. The quality of diagnostic communication contributed to patient perception of diagnostic accuracy and understanding of the diagnosis. Conclusions: Patient report is a useful tool for assessing diagnostic excellence in emergency settings. Our patient and care partners describe how they assess diagnostic excellence in the emergency department.Registration: N/A.Tweetable abstract: Patients and care partners provide accessible and useful information to assess diagnostic practices and diagnostic excellence in emergency departments.

Diagnostic agreement between emergency medical service and emergency department physicians, a prospective multicentre study

Diagnostic Discrepancies in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study

Examining emergency departments practices on advance care directives and medical treatment decision making using the victorian emergency minimum dataset

Early diagnosis of sepsis in emergency departments, time to treatment, and association with mortality: An observational study

Acute internal medicine physicians' clinical intuition based on acute care telephone referral: A prospective study

Validating the Emergency Department Avoidability Classification (EDAC): A cluster randomized single-blinded agreement study

Suitability of emergency department attenders to be assessed in primary care: survey of general practitioner agreement in a random sample of triage records analysed in a service evaluation project

Physicians' training and patient education initiative to improve quality of care decision communication at the emergency department

Enhancing the accuracy of a multivariable prediction model to identify medical patients suitable for Same Day Emergency Care services

Impact of emergency department surge and end of shift on patient workup and treatment prior to referral to internal medicine: a health records review

Addressing diagnostic uncertainty and excellence in emergency care--from multicountry policy analysis to communication practice in Australian emergency departments: a multimethod study protocol

Sepsis incidence, suspicion, prediction and mortality in emergency medical services: a cohort study related to the current international sepsis guideline

Patient and care partner assessments of diagnostic excellence in the emergency department: A cognitive interview study

Patient–Clinician Diagnostic Concordance upon Hospital Admission

Abstract W P210: Stroke Alert Notification by Emergency Department or Emergency Medical Service Which One Shortened Door to Needle Time?

Clinical use of an emergency manual by resuscitation teams and impact on performance in the emergency department: a prospective mixed-methods study protocol

Characteristics and outcomes of emergency department patients across health care systems: an international multicenter cohort study

Acil servis tanıları ile paramediklerin ilk değerlendirme tanılarının karşılaştırılması

Diagnoses and mortality among prehospital emergency patients calling 112 with unclear problems: a population-based cohort study from Denmark

Emergency nurse practitioners and doctors consulting with patients in an emergency department: a comparison of communication skills and satisfaction

Accuracy of emergency medical services (EMS) telephone triage in identifying acute coronary syndrome (ACS) for patients with chest pain: a systematic literature review