Abstract:BackgroundUnderstanding sex and gender in health research can improve the quality of scholarship and enhance health outcomes. Funding agencies and academic journals are two key gatekeepers of knowledge production and dissemination, including whether and how sex/gender is incorporated into health research. Though attention has been paid to key issues and practices in accounting for sex/gender in health funding agencies and academic journals, to date, there has been no systematic analysis documenting whether and how agencies and journals require attention to sex/gender, what conceptual explanations and practical guidance are given for such inclusion, and whether existing practices reflect the reality that sex/gender cannot be separated from other axes of inequality.MethodsOur research systematically examines official statements about sex/gender inclusion from 45 national-level funding agencies that fund health research across 36 countries (covering the regions of the EU and associated countries, North America, and Australia) and from ten top-ranking general health (the top five in “science” and the top five in “social science”) and ten sex- and/or gender-related health journals. We explore the extent to which agencies and journals require inclusion of sex/gender considerations and to what extent existing strategies reflect state of the art understandings of sex/gender, including intersectional perspectives.ResultsThe research highlights the following: (a) there is no consistency in whether sex/gender are mentioned in funding and publishing guidelines; (b) there is wide variation in how sex/gender are conceptualized and how researchers are asked to address the inclusion/exclusion of sex/gender in research; (c) funding agencies tend to prioritize male/female equality in research teams and funding outcomes over considerations of sex/gender in research content and knowledge production; and (d) with very few exceptions, agency and journal criteria fail to recognize the complexity of sex/gender, including the intersection of sex/gender with other key factors that shape health.ConclusionsThe conceptualization and integration of sex/gender needs to better capture the interacting and complex factors that shape health—an imperative that can be informed by an intersectional approach. This can strengthen current efforts to advance scientific excellence in the production and reporting of research. We provide recommendations and supporting questions to strengthen consideration of sex/gender in policies and practices of health journals and funding agencies.

We need more-nuanced approaches to exploring sex and gender in research

Why it's essential to study sex and gender, even as tensions rise

Social psychological research on gender, sexuality, and relationships: reflections on contemporary scientific and cultural challenges

Sex and gender discussions don't need to be toxic

Sex, Gender and Health: Mapping the Landscape of Research and Policy

The future of sex and gender in research

Troubling genderS and consumer well‐being: Going across, between and beyond the binaries to gender/sex/ual and intersectional diversity

Sex contextualism in laboratory research: Enhancing rigor and precision in the study of sex-related variables

Considering sex as a biological variable will require a global shift in science culture

Best Practices for Collecting Gender and Sex Data

Are surveys blind to sexual and gender diversity? Reflections and an open proposal

The history of sex research: Is "sex" a useful category?

The Future of Sex and Gender in Psychology: Five Challenges to the Gender Binary

Researchers' sex/gender identity influences how sex/gender question is investigated in neuroscience: an example from an OHBM meeting

Gender, women and scientific research

Challenging the binary: Gender/sex and the bio-logics of normalcy

Gender Trouble in Social Psychology: How Can Butler’s Work Inform Experimental Social Psychologists’ Conceptualization of Gender?

Beyond the trans/cis binary: introducing new terms will enrich gender research

Humanizing Different Archetypal Expressions of Gender Expansiveness1

A Question of Gender: Gender classification in international research

Beyond sex and gender difference in funding and reporting of health research