Abstract:Background Epidemiologists need tools to measure effects of gender , a complex concept originating in the social sciences which is not easily operationalized in the discipline. Our aim is to clarify useful concepts, measures, paths, effects, and analytical strategies to explore mechanisms of health difference between men and women. Methods We reviewed concepts to clarify their definitions and limitations for their translation into usable measures in Epidemiology. Then we conducted methodological research using a causal framework to propose methodologically appropriate strategies for measuring sex and gender effects in health. Results (1) Concepts and measures. We define gender as a set of norms prescribed to individuals according to their attributed-at-birth sex. G ender pressure creates a systemic gap, at population level, in behaviors, activities, experiences, etc., between men and women. A pragmatic individual measure of gender would correspond to the level at which an individual complies with a set of elements constituting femininity or masculinity in a given population, place and time. (2) Main analytical strategy. Defining and measuring gender are not sufficient to distinguish the effects of sex and gender on a health outcome. We should also think in terms of mechanisms, i.e., how the variables are linked together, to define appropriate analytical strategies. A causal framework can help us to conceptualize "sex" as a "parent" of a gender or gendered variable. This implies that we cannot interpret sex effects as sexed mechanisms, and that we can explore gendered mechanisms of sex-differences by mediation analyses. (3) Alternative strategy. Gender could also be directly examined as a mechanism, rather than through a variable representing its realization in the individual, by approaching it as an interaction between sex and social environment. Conclusions Both analytical strategies have limitations relative to the impossibility of reducing a complex concept to a single or a few measures, and of capturing the entire effect of the phenomenon of gender. However, these strategies could lead to more accurate analyses of the mechanisms underlying health differences between men and women.

A Question of Gender: Gender classification in international research

Are surveys blind to sexual and gender diversity? Reflections and an open proposal

Best Practices for Collecting Gender and Sex Data

Researchers' sex/gender identity influences how sex/gender question is investigated in neuroscience: an example from an OHBM meeting

Sex, gender and work segregation in the cultural industries

The Role of Gender in Social Network Organization

Attitudes about gender bias in language: A reevaluation

Troubling genderS and consumer well‐being: Going across, between and beyond the binaries to gender/sex/ual and intersectional diversity

Comparing Two-Step Approaches to Measuring Gender Identity: The Reliability and Applications of Asking About Sex Assigned at Birth versus Transgender Self-Identification

Beyond the Boolean: How Programmers Ask About, Use, and Discuss Gender

Ethical considerations for data involving human gender and sex variables

The future of sex and gender in research

Gender differences in research topic and method selection in library and information science: Perspectives from three top journals

He/She/They - gender inclusivity in developing and using health-related questionnaires: a scoping review

A Review of occupation-based social classifications for social survey research

Gender, women and scientific research

Considering sex and gender in Epidemiology: a challenge beyond terminology. From conceptual analysis to methodological strategies

Deconstructing gender in brand, products and marketing

Gender Matters! Analyzing Global Cultural Gender Preferences for Venues Using Social Sensing

Effects of biological and psychological gender, age cohort, and interviewer gender on attitudes toward gender-inclusive/exclusive language

A deeper consideration of sex/gender in quantitative health research: a checklist for incorporating multidimensionality, variety, embodiment, and intersectionality throughout the whole research process