Abstract:Pronouns often convey information about a person's social identity (e.g., gender). Consequently, pronouns have become a focal point in academic and public debates about whether pronouns should be changed to be more inclusive, such as for people whose identities do not fit current pronoun conventions (e.g., gender nonbinary individuals). Here, we make an empirical contribution to these debates by investigating which social identities lay speakers think that pronouns should encode (if any) and why. Across four studies, participants were asked to evaluate different types of real and hypothetical pronouns, including binary gender pronouns, race pronouns, and identity-neutral pronouns. We sampled speakers of two languages with different pronoun systems: English (N = 1,120) and Turkish (N = 260). English pronouns commonly denote binary gender (e.g., "he" for men), whereas Turkish pronouns are identity-neutral (e.g., "o" for anyone). Participants' reasoning about pronouns reflected both a familiarity preference (i.e., participants preferred the pronoun type used in their language) and—critically—participants' social ideologies. In both language contexts, participants' ideological beliefs that social groups are inherently distinct (essentialism) and should be hierarchal (social dominance orientation) predicted relatively greater endorsement of binary gender pronouns and race pronouns. A preregistered experimental study with an English-speaking sample showed that the relationship between ideology and pronoun endorsement is causal: Ideologies shape attitudes toward pronouns. Together, the present research contributes to linguistic and psychological theories concerning how people reason about language and informs policy-relevant questions about whether and how to implement language changes for social purposes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Attitudes about gender bias in language: A reevaluation

Gender Bias in English: In Search of Fair Language

Effects of biological and psychological gender, age cohort, and interviewer gender on attitudes toward gender-inclusive/exclusive language

Reducing a Male Bias in Language? Establishing the Efficiency of Three Different Gender-Fair Language Strategies

“Master” of none: Institutional language change linked to reduced gender bias.

Gender Bias and Sexism in Language

How do the social changes influence the English language grammar?

Language, communication and society: a gender based linguistics analysis

People's beliefs about pronouns reflect both the language they speak and their ideologies.

Using Sociolinguistic Variables to Reveal Changing Attitudes Towards Sexuality and Gender

Neutral is not fair enough: testing the efficiency of different language gender-fair strategies

Gender representation in linguistic example sentences

Theories of "Gender" in NLP Bias Research

Do language models practice what they preach? Examining language ideologies about gendered language reform encoded in LLMs

Can societal language amendments change gender representation? The case of Norway

Does Alternating Between Masculine and Feminine Pronouns Eliminate Perceived Gender Bias in Text?

How Conservative are Language Models? Adapting to the Introduction of Gender-Neutral Pronouns

Adopting Gender-Inclusive Language Reforms: Diachronic and Synchronic Variation

Registered report protocol: Perceptual effects of Arabic grammatical gender on occupational expectations in a gamified speech production task

Implicit Gender Bias in Linguistic Descriptions for Expected Events: The Cases of the 2016 United States and 2017 United Kingdom Elections

Gender and Attitudes towards English Language Teaching in China