Abstract:There are widespread calls for increased demographic diversity in science, often linked to the epistemic claim that including more perspectives will improve the quality of the knowledge produced. By distinguishing between demographic and epistemic diversity, we show that this is only true some of the time. There are cases where increasing demographic diversity will not bring about the necessary epistemic diversity and cases where failing to exclude some voices reduces the quality of the scientific debate. We seek to resolve these tensions with an analysis that turns on the way the experience-based expertise of non-scientists can be absorbed into mainstream science. Mostly it has to be done via what we call 'virtual diversity', in which scientists take responsibility for acquiring interactional expertise in the non-scientific expertise-based domains which they consider provide knowledge valuable to the science. We argue that virtual diversity represents the only feasible option in most scenarios, with cases where demographic diversity or full cultural mergers provide the solution being the exception rather than the rule. This analysis is an exercise in the sociology of knowledge, which is considered as being continuous with philosophy. The paper is prescriptive as well as descriptive, and the moral, cultural, political, and educational implications of the argument are drawn out. A main conclusion is that the acquisition of virtual diversity should be a new norm for science, allowing the voices of experienced non-scientist citizens to be heard but without eroding the institution of science, which continues to be a vital foundation of truth in democracy.

To advance science we need to address 'otherness'

Science needs neurodiversity

Unpacking the Concept of Otherness: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives

Pride-and-Prejudice Perspectives of Marginalization Can Advance Science and Society

When the science encounters "the others"

Social psychological research on gender, sexuality, and relationships: reflections on contemporary scientific and cultural challenges

Virtual diversity: Resolving the tension between the wider culture and the institution of science

We need more-nuanced approaches to exploring sex and gender in research

Science Needs You: Mobilizing for Diversity in Award Recognition

On the Frontier of Redefining “Intelligent Life” in Settler Science

Towards Equitable, Social Justice Criticality: Re-Constructing the “Black” Box and Making it Transparent for the Future of Science and Technology in Science Education

We must discuss research environments

(Absent) Allyship in STEM: Can Psychological Standing Increase Prejudice Confrontation?

Diversity of contributions is not efficient but is essential for science

Diversity Is Diverse: Social Justice Reparations and Science

The multicontext path to redefining how we access and think about diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM

Embracing the Social in Social Science

A special section: Contributions of family science to anti‐racism efforts

Creating cultural refugia to transform the boundaries of science

Should We All be Scientists? Re-thinking Laboratory Research as a Calling

Dealing With Diversity in Psychology: Science and Ideology