Abstract:Background: Most economic theories are based on the premise that individuals maximize their own self-interest and correctly incorporate the structure of their environment into all decisions, thanks to human intelligence. The influence of this paradigm goes far beyond academia-it underlies current macroeconomic and monetary policies, and is also an integral part of existing financial regulations. However, there is mounting empirical and experimental evidence, including the recent financial crisis, suggesting that humans do not always behave rationally, but often make seemingly random and suboptimal decisions. Methods and findings: Here we propose to reconcile these contradictory perspectives by developing a simple binary-choice model that takes evolutionary consequences of decisions into account as well as the role of intelligence, which we define as any ability of an individual to increase its genetic success. If no intelligence is present, our model produces results consistent with prior literature and shows that risks that are independent across individuals in a generation generally lead to risk-neutral behaviors, but that risks that are correlated across a generation can lead to behaviors such as risk aversion, loss aversion, probability matching, and randomization. When intelligence is present the nature of risk also matters, and we show that even when risks are independent, either risk-neutral behavior or probability matching will occur depending upon the cost of intelligence in terms of reproductive success. In the case of correlated risks, we derive an implicit formula that shows how intelligence can emerge via selection, why it may be bounded, and how such bounds typically imply the coexistence of multiple levels and types of intelligence as a reflection of varying environmental conditions. Conclusions: Rational economic behavior in which individuals maximize their own self interest is only one of many possible types of behavior that arise from natural selection. The key to understanding which types of behavior are more likely to survive is how behavior affects reproductive success in a given population's environment. From this perspective, intelligence is naturally defined as behavior that increases the probability of reproductive success, and bounds on rationality are determined by physiological and environmental constraints.

The economics of self-protection

Self-protection, Psychological Externalities, and the Social Dynamics of Fear

Optimal self‐protection and health risk perceptions: Exploring connections between risk theory and the Health Belief Model

Comparative risk aversion in two periods: An application to self‐insurance and self‐protection

Self-protection and insurance demand with convex premium principles

The case of 'Less is more': Modelling risk-preference with Expected Downside Risk

Portfolio choice in the model of expected utility with a safety-first component

The Skin In The Game Heuristic for Protection Against Tail Events

A New Perspective on Internet Security using Insurance

Optimal Saving and Health Prevention

Dancing Pigs or Externalities? Measuring the Rationality of Security Decisions

An agent-based model of repeated decision making under risk: modeling the role of alternate reference points and risk behavior on long-run outcomes

Pricing and Investments in Internet Security: A Cyber-Insurance Perspective

Individual vs. overarching protection for minimizing the expected damage caused by an attack

An evolutionary model of bounded rationality and intelligence

On the Possibility of Profitable Self-Selection Contracts in Competitive Insurance Markets

Insurance customer behavior: Lessons from behavioral economics

Risk preferences and risk perceptions in insurance experiments: some methodological challenges

The Economics of Privacy

The Effect of Disappointment Aversion on Risk Prevention

Rationalizing risk aversion in science