Abstract:The masses of galaxy clusters are commonly measured from X-ray observations under the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium (HSE). This technique is known to underestimate the true mass systematically. The fiducial FLAMINGO cosmological hydrodynamical simulation predicts the median hydrostatic mass bias to increase from $b_\text{HSE} \equiv (M_\text{HSE,500c}-M_\text{500c})/M_\text{500c} \approx -0.1$ to -0.2 when the true mass increases from group to cluster mass scales. However, the bias is nearly independent of the hydrostatic mass. The scatter at fixed true mass is minimum for $M_\text{500c}\sim 10^{14}~\text{M}_\odot$, where $\sigma(b_\text{HSE})\approx 0.1$, but increases rapidly towards lower and higher masses. At a fixed true mass, the hydrostatic masses increase (decrease) with redshift on group (cluster) scales, and the scatter increases. The bias is insensitive to the choice of analytic functions assumed to represent the density and temperature profiles, but it is sensitive to the goodness of fit, with poorer fits corresponding to a stronger median bias and a larger scatter. The bias is also sensitive to the strength of stellar and AGN feedback. Models predicting lower gas fractions yield more (less) biased masses for groups (clusters). The scatter in the bias at fixed true mass is due to differences in the pressure gradients rather than in the temperature at $R_\text{500c}$. The total kinetic energies within $r_\text{500c}$ in low- and high-mass clusters are sub- and super-virial, respectively, though all become sub-virial when external pressure is accounted for. Analyses of the terms in the virial and Euler equations suggest that non-thermal motions, including rotation, account for most of the hydrostatic mass bias. However, we find that the mass bias estimated from X-ray luminosity weighted profiles strongly overestimates the deviations from hydrostatic equilibrium.

Caustic and hydrostatic mass bias: Implications for modified gravity

Caustic and hydrostatic mass bias: Implications for modified gravity

Weighing Galaxy Clusters with Gas. II. On the Origin of Hydrostatic Mass Bias in LambdaCDM Galaxy Clusters

Mass modeling of galaxy clusters: quantifying hydrostatic bias and contribution from non-thermal pressure

Intrinsic scatter of caustic masses and hydrostatic bias: An observational study

Measuring the hydrostatic mass bias in galaxy clusters by combining Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and CMB lensing data

Mass Modeling and Kinematics of Galaxy Clusters in Modified Gravity

Gas clumping and its effect on hydrostatic bias in the MACSIS simulations

Biases in Hydrostatic Mass Profiles Introduced by Hot Gas Substructures:Chandrastudy of Four Galaxy Clusters

Measuring the Mass Distribution in Galaxy Clusters

The hydrostatic-to-lensing mass bias from resolved X-ray and optical-IR data

Characterizing hydrostatic mass bias with Mock-X

Hydrostatic mass of galaxy clusters within some theories of gravity

Hydrostatic mass bias for galaxy groups and clusters in the FLAMINGO simulations

Testing Strict Hydrostatic Equilibrium in Simulated Clusters of Galaxies: Implications to Abell 1689

The Large Scale Biasing and the Primordial Gravitational Potential

A disturbing FABLE of mergers, feedback, turbulence, and mass biases in simulated galaxy clusters

A new step forward in realistic cluster lens mass modelling: Analysis of Hubble Frontier Field Cluster Abell S1063 from joint lensing, X-ray and galaxy kinematics data

On the Cluster Physics of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and X-ray Surveys III: Measurement Biases and Cosmological Evolution of Gas and Stellar Mass Fractions

The hydrostatic mass bias in The Three Hundred clusters

Cosmology and astrophysics from relaxed galaxy clusters - IV: Robustly calibrating hydrostatic masses with weak lensing