Abstract:Galaxy clustering sets strong constraints on the physics governing galaxy formation and evolution. However, most current models fail to reproduce the clustering of low-mass galaxies on small scales (r < 1 Mpc h(-1)). In this paper, we study the galaxy clusterings predicted from a few semi-analytical models. We first compare two Munich versions, Guo et al. and De Lucia & Blaizot. The Guo11 model well reproduces the galaxy stellar mass function, but overpredicts the clustering of low-mass galaxies on small scales. The DLB07 model provides a better fit to the clustering on small scales, but overpredicts the stellar mass function. These seem to be puzzling. The clustering on small scales is dominated by galaxies in the same dark matter halo, and there is slightly more fraction of satellite galaxies residing in massive haloes in the Guo11 model, which is the dominant contribution to the clustering discrepancy between the two models. However, both models still overpredict the clustering at 0.1 < r < 10 Mpc h(-1) for low-mass galaxies. This is because both models overpredict the number of satellites by 30 per cent in massive haloes than the data. We show that the Guo11 model could be slightly modified to simultaneously fit the stellar mass function and clusterings, but that cannot be easily achieved in the DLB07 model. The better agreement of DLB07 model with the data actually comes as a coincidence as it predicts too many low-mass central galaxies which are less clustered and thus brings down the total clustering. Finally, we show the predictions from the semi-analytical models of Kang et al. We find that this model can simultaneously fit the stellar mass function and galaxy clustering if the supernova feedback in satellite galaxies is stronger. We conclude that semi-analytical models are now able to solve the small-scales clustering problem, without invoking of any other new physics or changing the dark matter properties, such as the recent favoured warm dark matter.

Testing Strict Hydrostatic Equilibrium in Simulated Clusters of Galaxies: Implications to Abell 1689

Weighing Galaxy Clusters with Gas. II. On the Origin of Hydrostatic Mass Bias in LambdaCDM Galaxy Clusters

Cosmology and astrophysics from relaxed galaxy clusters - IV: Robustly calibrating hydrostatic masses with weak lensing

On the nature of hydrostatic equilibrium in galaxy clusters

Turbulent Pressure Support in Galaxy Clusters -- Impact of the Hydrodynamical Solver

Mass modeling of galaxy clusters: quantifying hydrostatic bias and contribution from non-thermal pressure

The Hydrostatic Mass of A478: Discrepant Results From Chandra, NuSTAR, and XMM-Newton

Simulations of X-ray Clusters

On the Cluster Physics of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and X-ray Surveys III: Measurement Biases and Cosmological Evolution of Gas and Stellar Mass Fractions

Measuring the hydrostatic mass bias in galaxy clusters by combining Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and CMB lensing data

Hydrostatic equilibrium of X-ray gas in X-COP clusters with HMG

Resolving the Problem of Galaxy Clustering on Small Scales: Any New Physics Needed?

Evidence from Gravitational Lensing for a Non-Thermal Pressure Support in the Cluster of Galaxies A2218

A Comparison of X-ray and Strong Lensing Properties of Simulated X-ray Clusters

Gas thermodynamics meets galaxy kinematics: Joint mass measurements for eROSITA galaxy clusters

Simulations of Clusters of Galaxies

Mass & Light in Galaxy Clusters: The case of Abell 370

Accurate Realizations of the Ionized Gas in Galaxy Clusters: Calibrating Feedback

A new step forward in realistic cluster lens mass modelling: Analysis of Hubble Frontier Field Cluster Abell S1063 from joint lensing, X-ray and galaxy kinematics data

Gas clumping and its effect on hydrostatic bias in the MACSIS simulations

Galaxy Clusters in Hubble Volume Simulations: Cosmological Constraints from Sky Survey Populations