Abstract:Methane emissions contribute to global warming, damage public health and reduce the yield of agricultural and forest ecosystems. Quantifying these damages to the planetary commons by calculating the social cost of methane (SCM) facilitates more comprehensive cost-benefit analyses of methane emissions control measures and is the first step to potentially incorporating them into the marketplace. Use of a broad measure of social welfare is also an attractive alternative or supplement to emission metrics focused on a temperature target in a given year as it incentivizes action to provide benefits over a broader range of impacts and timescales. Calculating the SCM using consistent temporal treatment of physical and economic processes and incorporating climate- and air quality-related impacts, we find large SCM values, e.g. ∼$2400 per ton and ∼$3600 per ton with 5% and 3% discount rates respectively. These values are ∼100 and 50 times greater than corresponding social costs for carbon dioxide. Our results suggest that ∼110 of 140 Mt of identified methane abatement via scaling up existing technology and policy options provide societal benefits that outweigh implementation costs. Within the energy sector, renewables compare far better against use of natural gas in electricity generation when incorporating these social costs for methane. In the agricultural sector, changes in livestock management practices, promoting healthy diets including reduced beef and dairy consumption, and reductions in food waste have been promoted as ways to mitigate emissions, and these are shown here to indeed have the potential to provide large societal benefits (∼$50–150 billion per year). Examining recent trends in methane and carbon dioxide, we find that increases in methane emissions may have offset much of the societal benefits from a slowdown in the growth rate of carbon dioxide emissions. The results indicate that efforts to reduce methane emissions via policies spanning a wide range of technical, regulatory and behavioural options provide benefits at little or negative net cost. Recognition of the full SCM, which has typically been undervalued, may help catalyze actions to reduce emissions and thereby provide a broad set of societal benefits.

Social Costs of Methane and Carbon Dioxide in a Tipping Climate

Damage Function Uncertainty Increases the Social Cost of Methane and Nitrous Oxide

The social cost of methane: theory and applications

Including climate system feedbacks in calculations of the social cost of methane

The Social Cost of Ozone-Related Mortality Impacts From Methane Emissions

Upward revision of the social costs of methane and nitrous oxide

Equity is more important for the social cost of methane than climate uncertainty

Tipping Elements, Tipping Points, and Economic Catastrophes: Implications for the Cost of Climate Change

The Social Cost of Carbon with Economic and Climate Risks

The social cost of carbon dioxide under climate-economy feedbacks and temperature variability

Marginal Damage of Methane Emissions: Ozone Impacts on Agriculture

Declining CO2 price paths

Economists' erroneous estimates of damages from climate change

Climate change, tipping points, and economics

Investigating climate tipping points under various emission reduction and carbon capture scenarios with a stochastic climate model

The social cost of carbon driven by green behaviors

Trends and biases in the social cost of carbon

Climate uncertainty impacts on optimal mitigation pathways and social cost of carbon

Present global warming: A justifiable and stable metric for evaluating short-lived climate pollutants

Discounting the Future: On Climate Change, Ambiguity Aversion and Epstein–Zin Preferences

An Assessment of the Climate Damage Costs of European Short-Lived Climate Forcers