Abstract:An updated and extended meta-analysis confirms that the central estimate of the social cost of carbon is around $200/tC with a large, right-skewed uncertainty and trending up. The pure rate of time preference and the inverse of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution are key assumptions, the total impact of 2.5K warming less so. The social cost of carbon is much higher if climate change is assumed to affect economic growth rather than the level of output and welfare. The literature is dominated by a relatively small network of authors, based in a few countries. Publication and citation bias have pushed the social cost of carbon up.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to update and expand the meta - analysis on the Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) to confirm the trends, uncertainties and biases in the SCC estimates in the literature. Specifically, the study mainly focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Confirm the central estimate of SCC and its uncertainty**: - The study confirms that the central estimate of SCC is approximately $200 per ton of carbon ($200/tC), and points out that it has large uncertainty and is right - skewed. In addition, the SCC estimates show an upward trend. 2. **The impact of key assumptions**: - The pure rate of time preference and the inverse of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution are key assumptions that affect SCC. Changes in these parameters will have a significant impact on SCC. For example, for every one - percentage - point increase in the pure rate of time preference, SCC will decrease by $112 per ton of carbon ($112/tC); for every one - unit increase in the inverse of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution, SCC will decrease by $45 per ton of carbon ($45/tC). 3. **The impact of climate change on the economy**: - If it is assumed that climate change will affect economic growth rather than output levels and welfare, then SCC will be higher. In particular, if 2.5 °C of global warming causes a 1% reduction in GDP, SCC will increase by $20 per ton of carbon ($20/tC). 4. **Publication and citation biases**: - The study explores the impact of publication biases and citation biases on SCC estimates. The results show that some journals are more likely to publish higher SCC estimates, which may push up the overall average. In addition, authors systematically ignore earlier higher estimates, making their own higher estimates appear novel. 5. **The influence of authors and countries**: - The study finds that SCC literature is mainly dominated by researchers from a few countries, especially Europe and North America. Researchers from different countries have differences in assumptions and conclusions, but these differences do not significantly affect SCC estimates. 6. **Network effects**: - The study also analyzes the impact of co - author networks and citation networks on SCC estimates. The results show that the SCC estimates in some networks are significantly higher than those in other networks, but this is mainly due to differences in combined assumptions rather than a single factor. ### Summary By updating and expanding the meta - analysis, this paper reveals the uncertainties and trends in SCC estimates and explores the impact of publication and citation biases on SCC estimates. The research results emphasize the complexity and diversity of SCC estimates and the potential bias problems in the literature.

Trends and biases in the social cost of carbon

Estimates of the social cost of carbon have increased over time

Social cost of carbon estimates have increased over time

A meta-analysis of the total economic impact of climate change

Towards a representative social cost of carbon

Comprehensive Evidence Implies a Higher Social Cost of CO2

Towards a social cost of carbon with national characteristics

The social cost of carbon dioxide under climate-economy feedbacks and temperature variability

Social cost of carbon emissions in spotlight

Country-level social cost of carbon

The Social Cost of Carbon with Economic and Climate Risks

Revisiting the social cost of carbon

The social cost of carbon driven by green behaviors

Social cost of carbon under a carbon-neutral pathway

How expensive should CO2 be? Fuel for the political debate on optimal climate policy

On Simple Rules for the Social Cost of Carbon

Novel Research Methods for Estimating the Impact of Energy Use on Ecological Environment: Evidence from B.R.I.C.S. Economies

Climate uncertainty impacts on optimal mitigation pathways and social cost of carbon

Social Cost of Carbon as an International Benchmark to Drive Countries' Carbon Pricing during the Transition

Urban and non-urban contributions to the social cost of carbon

Internalization of the social cost of carbon in each of the countries of the world—An economic assessment of its impacts