Feasibility of a novel atrial mechanical sensing method for leadless atrioventricular synchronous pacing

Shuichiro Kazawa,Chifumi Kazawa,Tomoko Sakaida,Hidetaka Murakami,Yasuyuki Takada,Takahiro Kusume,Muryo Terasawa,Nobuhiro Tanaka,Kazuhiro Satomi,Yoshinao Yazaki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16255
IF: 2.7
2024-03-29
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Abstract:Micra AV is a leadless pacemaker that enables atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing with a three‐axis accelerometer sensor. However, it is still difficult to obtain high AV synchrony with Micra AV. The main problem of poor AV synchrony with conventional setting as being caused by the A3 window‐end. To solve the problem, a lower A3 threshold than A4 signal can be programmed (Simplified A3 method). In the "Simplified A3 method," adaptation of the A3 window‐end can be completely ignored, allowing focus on sensing of the A4 and A7 signals in any window. Fixed pacing values, with a lower A3 threshold, might improve AV synchrony. Introduction Few studies have demonstrated a high degree of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony with a new leadless pacemaker called Micra AV. Our group previously reported a new and unique sensing method. We believe that this novel sensing method, "Simplified A3 method," might facilitate better AV synchrony than a conventional sensing method in almost all cases with Micra AV implantation. Methods We conducted a non‐randomized retrospective study comparing the two pacing methods at two centers. From December 1, 2021 to October 31, 2022, Micra AV was implanted for 32 patients at the two centers. Twenty of the 32 patients with sinus rhythm and complete AV block were included in this study. In Group 1, the conventional setting was programmed as follows: auto A3 threshold, auto A3 window‐end (WE), and auto A4 threshold turned on during hospitalization. In Group 2, the "Simplified A3 method" was programmed as follows: auto A3 threshold and auto A3WE turned off. Instead, an intentionally prolonged A3WE (850–1000 ms) and low A3 threshold (A3 signal amplitude + 0.5–1.0 m/s2) were programmed. Results Twenty patients were analyzed. In Group 2, AV synchrony (%AMVp) was significantly higher at the first outpatient clinic (63.0 ± 5.7% vs 81.0 ± 4.2%, p = .03). A3 threshold was significantly lower in Group 2 (5.9 ± 0.7 m/s2, p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?