Advanced power cycles for coal-fired power plants based on calcium looping combustion: A techno-economic feasibility assessment

Sebastian Michalski,Dawid P. Hanak,Vasilije Manovic
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114954
IF: 11.2
2020-07-01
Applied Energy
Abstract:<p>Carbon capture and storage is crucial to decarbonising the power sector, as no other technology can significantly reduce emissions from fossil fuel power generation systems. Yet, the mature CO<sub>2</sub> capture technologies result in net efficiency penalties of at least 7% points. Emerging technologies, such as calcium looping combustion, can reduce the net efficiency penalty to 2.4% points. Further reductions can be achieved by replacing the conventional steam cycle with advanced power cycles. This study aimed to assess the techno-economic feasibility of the coal-fired power plant based on calcium looping combustion with different advanced Brayton cycles. These included single power cycles, such as recompression supercritical CO<sub>2</sub>, simple supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> cycle, and xenon cycle, as well as combined power cycles based on helium, nitrogen and recompression supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> cycles. The net efficiency and break-even electricity price, which was estimated using the net present value method, were used as the key techno-economic performance indicators. A parametric study was also conducted to assess the impact of the key thermodynamic parameters. This study showed that the case based on a single recompression supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> cycle had the best overall techno-economic performance, while the recompression supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> combined cycle case had the best techno-economic performance among combined cycle cases. The former was characterised with a net efficiency of 38.9%, which is higher than that of the reference coal-fired power plant without CO<sub>2</sub> capture (38.0%). Such performance was achieved at a break-even electricity price of 71.2 €/MW<sub>el,net</sub>h, corresponding to a cost of CO<sub>2</sub> avoided of 16.3 €/t<sub>CO2</sub>.</p>
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?