The Next Step Toward Patient-Centeredness in Multidisciplinary Cancer Team Meetings: An Interview Study with Professionals
Paulus A F Geerts,Trudy van der Weijden,Wilma Savelberg,Melis Altan,Giorgio Chisari,Diana Ricarda Launert,Hannah Mesters,Ylva Pisters,Mike van Heumen,Raoul Hermanns,Gerard M J Bos,Albine Moser,Paulus AF Geerts,Gerard MJ Bos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S286044
2021-06-04
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Paulus AF Geerts, 1 Trudy van der Weijden, 2 Wilma Savelberg, 3 Melis Altan, 4 Giorgio Chisari, 4 Diana Ricarda Launert, 4 Hannah Mesters, 4 Ylva Pisters, 4 Mike van Heumen, 4 Raoul Hermanns, 4 Gerard MJ Bos, 1 Albine Moser 2, 5 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and School GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; 2 Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, School CAPHRI, Maastricht, the Netherlands; 3 Oncology Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; 4 Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; 5 Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, the Netherlands Correspondence: Paulus AF Geerts Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and School GROW, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands Tel +31 6 20661124 Email Background: Patient-centeredness is essential in complex oncological multidisciplinary team decision-making. Improvement seems to be needed, while there is a lack of knowledge about health care providers' needs for improvement. Objective: To explore multidisciplinary team members' perspectives on the need to improve patient-centeredness in complex decision-making, and subsequently the strategies to enhance it. Methods: This was a qualitative descriptive interview study. The participants were twenty-four professionals who attended multidisciplinary cancer team meetings weekly. The setting was five multidisciplinary teams (gastrointestinal, gynecological, urological, head and neck, and hematological cancer) in a Dutch academic hospital. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews and were analyzed with a combination of inductive and deductive content analysis. Results: The participants voiced the need for additional information (patient-centered information, patients's needs and preferences, individualized medical information) during the multidisciplinary team meeting, to be more patient-centered in the decision-making conversation with the patient following the meeting, and for more information following the meeting to support patient-centeredness. The strategies, which mostly originated from the needs, were categorized as organization, decision-making, and communication. The most prominent strategies were those aimed at collecting and using patient-centered information, and to facilitate the decision-making conversation with the patient following the multidisciplinary team meeting. Conclusion: Our findings highlighted the need to improve patient-centeredness in oncological multidisciplinary teams and provided a comprehensive overview of strategies for improvement, supported by multidisciplinary team members. These strategies emphasize involvement of patients throughout the continuous process of decision-making for patients with cancer. These strategies may be implemented in other oncological multidisciplinary teams, taking in mind the local needs. Future research may help to prioritize the strategies and to determine and evaluate the effect on endpoints, like patient or professional satisfaction, shared decision-making, and on the decision that was made. Keywords: patient-centered care, decision-making, patient care team, cancer, patient care, multidisciplinary team Patient-centeredness has been designated to improve health care quality and equality. Patient-centeredness means that health care becomes more oriented to the patient as an individual and aims to be respectful and empowering. It implies the individual participation of the patient and is built on a relationship of mutual trust, sensitivity, empathy, and shared knowledge. Important decisions in the care for cancer patients are usually first discussed within a multidisciplinary team meeting: a meeting with different clinicians that are experts on the disease, diagnostics, and treatments. Thereafter, the team's diagnostic or treatment recommendations are discussed with the patients. It is known that patient-centeredness may need to be improved in team meetings. Therefore, we explored the needs of the team clinicians regarding improvements in patient-centeredness and discussed possible strategies for improvement with them. We interviewed 24 clinicians with different background specialties from five multidisciplinary teams involving different types of cancer. The clinicians needed more information about the patient as a person to base their recommendations on, for example, information about the situation at home, or thoughts of the patient about p -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services