The alliance–outcome relationship in individual psychotherapy for early psychosis: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial
Bryan J. Stiles Maku Orleans-Pobee Katherine Bullard Tate F. Halverson Piper S. Meyer-Kalos Diana Perkins David L. Penn Julia Browne a Department of Psychology and Neuroscience,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,Chapel Hill,NC,USAb VA Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research,Education and Clinical Center,Durham VA Healthcare System,Durham,NC,USAc Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,University of Minnesota Medical School,Minneapolis,MN,USAd Department of Psychiatry,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,Chapel Hill,NC,USAe School of Behavioural and Health Sciences,Australian Catholic University,Melbourne,VIC,Australiaf Center of Innovation in Long Term Services and Supports,VA Providence Healthcare System,Providence,RI,USAg Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior,Alpert Medical School of Brown University,Providence,RI,USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2024.2385832
2024-09-11
Psychosis
Abstract:Background Studies of the alliance–outcome relationship in psychosocial treatments for early psychosis are limited both in number and design, with few utilizing subjective measures as outcomes, multiple alliance timepoints or existing benchmarks to distinguish high or low levels of the alliance. We addressed these gaps in the context of a pilot randomized controlled psychotherapy trial for early psychosis.
psychiatry,psychology, clinical