Measuring patient participation in health care: a comprehensive systematic review protocol
Nicole M Phillips,Maryann Street,Emily Haesler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2014-1380
2014-03-01
JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports
Abstract:Review question/objective The primary objective of this review is to generate a list of evidence‐based determinants used for assessing patient participation. The review will synthesize the best available evidence for assessing patient participation in health care. Patient participation is the active involvement of the patient in planning, delivery, monitoring and evaluation of their own care. A patient is an individual receiving care services from an organization providing health care. In the context of this review, patient participation will include the active involvement of non‐professional carers/caregivers (e.g. family members and significant others) who support the patient, particularly adults who are unable to advocate on their own behalf (e.g. those with cognitive impairment). The review questions are: What are the available instruments that can be used to measure patient participation in healthcare? What criteria do available instruments incorporate? Are the identified instruments used to measure patient participation in healthcare reliable and valid? What is the feasibility of the identified instruments to measure patient participation in healthcare? What other available strategies can be used to assess patient participation in healthcare? What are the components of other available strategies? Are other identified strategies feasible to assess patient participation in healthcare? Background Promoting patient participation is recognized as a component of high quality health care, and there is evidence that a patient‐centered focus can result in significant benefits in terms of care quality and experience of care. Outcomes relating to quality of care include a reduction in mortality,1 readmission rates,2 length of stay and infection,3 as well as improved adherence to treatment regimens,4 and improved functional status.5 Involvement of the patient in quality improvement initiatives can lead to improved quality of care,6‐8 as well as better patient outcomes.9‐11 Hospitals that provide patient‐centered care have financial benefits including reduced length of stay, lower inpatient costs, decreased adverse events, higher employee retention rates, reduced operating costs and decreased malpractice claims.12 Measurement of patient participation in health care is a relatively new concept, introduced in western Europe, North America and Australia over the previous 25 years.13 The World Health Organization World Alliance for Patient Safety is actively focused on the role that patients and their families could play in the improvement of health care.14 Evidence is emerging that patient participation can enhance decision making processes, reduce medical errors, optimize self‐management for patients with chronic illness and improve patient adherence to health care practices.15 As such, health services internationally now include consumer‐centered care and partnering with consumers as an aspect of service delivery and design. In 1998, Cahill observed that a standardized definition of patient participation and reliable, valid measures for assessing the extent to which this concept is executed in practice are needed.16 Over a decade later, the concept of patient participation remains poorly defined. Various terms, including patient involvement, partnership, empowerment, collaboration and patient‐centered care are used interchangeably.15 Despite the now common practice of gathering feedback from patients, its use to stimulate quality improvement remains poorly characterized. In an overview of measurement of patient participation in health care, Coulter, Fitzpatrick et al., highlighted the first stage of the measurement process as being the development of agreed standards, each with a set of measureable indicators focused on patient‐centered care and patient priorities.17 Development of measurable indicators has been a focus of health service quality improvement internationally. In 2006, the Organization for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD) prepared an overview of health care quality indicators in 23 countries represented in the OECD; laying the foundation for international benchmark indicators that embrace and build upon health service quality frameworks already implemented in six major OECD countries (Australia, Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States).18 Within Australia, 10 National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) standards have been designed to protect the public from harm and to improve the quality of health service provision.19 These standards are integral to the Australian health care accreditation process, as they determine the criteria on which an organization's performance will be assessed, and indicators against which performance will be measured. Similarly, other OECD countries document standards and quality indicators that are comparable to those used in the Australian setting.18 The second Australian NSQHS standard, ‘Partnering with Consumers’, describes the systems and strategies to create a consumer‐centered health system through inclusion of consumers in the development and design of quality health care.19 This requires active involvement of consumers in the review, design and implementation of health services with a goal of improved safety, quality and efficiency. Thus, the first stage of the process defined by Coulter, Fitzpatrick et al., in which agreed standards are defined, is prescribed within the NSQHS Standards.17 Equally, health care quality indicators in other OECD countries prescribe to the principle of consumer involvement, variously referred to as patient centeredness, patient focus or responsiveness.18 The development of measureable indicators of patient participation is ongoing both in Australia and internationally. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) includes ‘patient experience’ as a national quality indicator to be reported by health care facilities that encompasses patient satisfaction, involvement in and support for health care, but specific ways in which this should be measured and reported remain undefined.20 The OECD is also yet to finalize its work on measurable quality indicators of patient participation.18 Reliable strategies to measure and evaluate the achievement of quality indicators of patient participation have therefore received minimal attention within the NSQHS Standards structure; although work identifying the most appropriate measurement strategies is ongoing. As part of the OECD project on quality indicators in health care, the Norwegian Knowledge Center for Health Services reviewed surveys that have been used to measure patient experience in international health care settings. The reviewers identified numerous large scale patient surveys that have been undertaken in OECD and non‐OECD countries to measure patient experiences, and identified both qualitative and quantitative strategies that could be adopted by health care facilities, including some surveys that were under development at the time of the review.18 Elwyn, Edwards et al., reviewed instruments for measuring patient involvement in shared decision making and found existing instruments had not been specifically developed to measure patient involvement, were developed for different purposes and were not validated.21 In their comprehensive report on measuring patient experience with health care services, Coulter, Fitzpatrick et al., outlined a range of measurement strategies including surveys, interviews, focus groups, patient diaries, ‘mystery shopping’ and journey mapping.17 However, the authors did not report the implementation, validation or effectiveness of these tools. Health care services currently use a range of strategies to evaluate patient‐centered care and partnerships with patients and their significant others. The two primary approaches to measuring patient participation are external observation methods and self‐report instruments. Examples of tools using external observation for measuring patient involvement in shared decision making are the Option Scale,22 and Rochester Participatory Decision‐Making Scale (RPAD).23 More often, health care services rely on self‐report instruments for measuring patient satisfaction and experience. Surveys are often given to a patient when they leave hospital after a period of inpatient care, or the patient is asked to complete a questionnaire prior to discharge. Post discharge feedback may provide more reliable information about the quality of care because respondents have had time to reflect on their experiences.17 More recently, rapid feedback involving online surveys have also been used.24 Although some of the items in these surveys relate to patient participation in their health care, the focus is often patient satisfaction and experience, rather than involvement. A review of patient experience and satisfaction surveys conducted within public and private hospitals in Australia identified that 80% of surveys included items which related to patient participation in care decisions.25 The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care has hosted a series of roundtable meetings where experts have provided advice towards the development of core common questions for hospital patient experience measurement. However, it is important to note that the evidence‐base for criteria to measure patient participation in health care and improvements as a result of patient participation was not established. This systematic review endeavors to provide an updated synthesis of evidence on effective strategies through which patient involvement in health care can be measured and assessed, with a goal of assisting health care services to demonstrate patient‐centered care in practice and benchmark their performance on the international stage. The primary outcome for this review will be a preliminary list of evidence‐based criteria used for assessing patient participation. Specifically, this will assist Australian health care services in demonstrating patient‐centered care in practice as required in the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standard 2, ‘Partnering with Consumers’, but will be relevant internationally for facilities that measure patient participation.19 Limitations and future research needs addressing assessment and measurement of patient involvement in health care will also be identified.