Abstract:Background: Iterative reconstruction (IR) has increasingly replaced traditional reconstruction methods in computed tomography (CT). The next paradigm shift in image reconstruction is likely to come from artificial intelligence, with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) solutions already entering the clinic. An enduring disadvantage to IR has been a change in noise texture, which can affect diagnostic confidence. DLR has demonstrated the potential to overcome this issue and has recently become available for dual-energy CT. Purpose: To evaluate the spatial resolution, noise properties, and detectability index of a commercially available DLR algorithm for dual-energy CT of the abdomen and compare it to single-energy (SE) CT. Methods: An oval 25 cm x 35 cm custom-made phantom was scanned on a GE Revolution CT scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) at two dose levels (13 and 5 mGy) and two iodine concentrations (8 and 2 mg/mL), using three typical abdominal scan protocols: dual-energy (DE), SE 80 kV (SE-80 kV) and SE 120 kV (SE-120 kV). Reconstructions were performed with three strengths of IR (ASiR-V: AR0%, AR50%, AR100%) and three strengths of DLR (TrueFidelity: low, medium, high). The DE acquisitions were reconstructed as mono-energetic images between 40 and 80 keV. The noise power spectrum (NPS), task transfer function (TTF), and detectability index (d') were determined for the reconstructions following the recommendations of AAPM Task Group 233. Results: Noise magnitude reductions (relative to AR0%) for the SE protocols were on average (-29%, -21%) for (AR50%, TF-M), while for DE-70 keV were (-28%, -43%). There was less reduction in mean frequency (fav ) for DLR than for IR, with similar results for SE and DE imaging. There was, however, a substantial change in the NPS shape when using DE with DLR, quantifiable by a marked reduction in the peak frequency (fpeak ) that was absent in SE mode. All protocols and reconstructions (including AR0%) exhibited slight to moderate shifts towards lower spatial frequencies at the lower dose (<12% in fav ). Spatial resolution was consistently superior for DLR compared to IR for SE but not for DE. All protocols and reconstructions (including AR0%) showed decreased resolution with reduced dose and iodine concentration, with less decrease for DLR compared to IR. DLR displayed a higher d' than IR. The effect of energy was large: d' increased with lower keV, and SE-80 kV had higher d' than SE-120 kV. Using DE with DLR could provide higher d' than SE-80 kV at the higher dose but not at lower dose. Conclusions: DE imaging with DLR maintained spatial resolution and reduced noise magnitude while displaying less change in noise texture than IR. The d' was also higher with DLR than IR, suggesting superiority in detectability of iodinated contrast. Despite these trends being consistent with those previously established for SE imaging, there were some noteworthy differences. For DE imaging there was no improvement in resolution compared to IR and a change in noise texture. DE imaging with low keV and DLR had superior detectability to SE DLR at the high dose but was not better than SE-80 kV at low dose.

Improved overall image quality in low-dose dual-energy computed tomography enterography using deep-learning image reconstruction

Deep learning image reconstruction generates thinner slice iodine maps with improved image quality to increase diagnostic acceptance and lesion conspicuity: a prospective study on abdominal dual-energy CT

A Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Improving Image Quality and Hepatic Lesion Detectability in Abdominal Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Preliminary Results

Deep learning image reconstruction for improving image quality of contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT in abdomen

Deep learning reconstruction CT for liver metastases: low-dose dual-energy vs standard-dose single-energy

Improving diagnostic confidence in low-dose dual-energy CTE with low energy level and deep learning reconstruction

Multi-reader multiparametric DECT study evaluating different strengths of iterative and deep learning-based image reconstruction techniques

The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images

A feasibility study of realizing low-dose abdominal CT using deep learning image reconstruction algorithm.

Performance evaluation of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for dual-energy spectral CT imaging: A phantom study

Deep learning-based reconstruction improves the image quality of low-dose CT enterography in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Application of deep learning image reconstruction in low-dose chest CT scan

Improving image quality of triple-low-protocol renal artery CT angiography with deep-learning image reconstruction: a comparative study with standard-dose single-energy and dual-energy CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction

Application of deep-learning reconstruction algorithm for enhanced CT scan of upper abdomen under different radiation doses: focus on noise, contrast-to-noise ratio and image quality

Dual-energy CT imaging using a single-energy CT data is feasible via deep learning

Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality and lesion visibility in renal computed tomography at different doses

Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study

Comparison of image quality and lesion diagnosis in abdominopelvic unenhanced CT between reduced-dose CT using deep learning post-processing and standard-dose CT using iterative reconstruction: A prospective study

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study

Spatial resolution, noise properties, and detectability index of a deep learning reconstruction algorithm for dual-energy CT of the abdomen

Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Improves the Image Quality of Low-Dose CT Colonography