Evaluation of catch-up growth from orthodontic treatment and supplemental growth hormone therapy by using Z-scores.

Yoshiko Tsuboi,T. Yamashiro,R. Ando,T. Takano-Yamamoto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.040

IF: 2.711

2008-03-01

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

P352 Comparison of Radiation Dose, Image Quality, and Diagnostic Performance between Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction and Deep Learning Reconstruction for CT Enterography of IBD

W He,P Xu,R L Xu,X H Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0482

2024-01-01

Journal of Crohn's and Colitis

Abstract:Abstract Background CT enterography (CTE) is recommended as one of the preferred methods for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially in primary hospitals that lack MRI equipment. However, the potential risk of radiation derived from using CTE during the life-long follow-up is an important issue for these patients. This study aimed to compare the radiation dose, image quality, and diagnostic performance of CTE for IBD using hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and deep learning reconstruction (DLR). Methods We prospectively collected data on low dose CTE reconstructed by HIR and DLR in patients with IBD between February 2023 and September 2023, and retrospectively enrolled IBD patients who underwent conventional dose CTE reconstructed by HIR between June 2019 and June 2022 as controls. The CTE examinations were performed within 2 weeks of bowel histologic evaluation (the reference standard of bowel inflammation). The objective and subjective image quality and the image features were evaluated by two IBD radiologists. The radiation dose, image quality, and diagnostic performance was compared between the two dose protocols. Results The preliminary study included 36 patients in the low dose group with HIR and DLR and 40 patients in the conventional dose group with HIR. There were no significant differences in demographic data of patients between the two groups (all P>0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for detecting active inflammation were 71.4% (43.3%), 83.3% (80.0%), and 75.0% (52.5%) for the low dose group with DLR (HIR), respectively, and 84.4%, 62.5%, and 80% for the conventional dose HIR group. Low dose group with DLR resulted in significantly increased objective and subjective image quality and diagnostic confidence for active inflammation compared to low dose group with HIR (all P<0.05), with no inferiority to conventional dose group with HIR (all P>0.05). The dichotomous inter-reader reliability (k) for the entire group was 0.88. Low dose group resulted in a significant reduction in radiation exposure (mean [± SD], 2.20 ± 0.29 mSv) compared to conventional dose group (4.85 ± 1.96 mSv; P<0.001). Conclusion Low dose CTE with DLR significantly improved image quality compared to low dose CTE with HIR, and maintained similarly high diagnostic performance as conventional dose CTE with HIR. Importantly, the low dose CTE with DLR significantly reduced the radiation dose, improving the safety of CTE application in the life-long follow-up of patients with IBD.

gastroenterology & hepatology
Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Improves the Image Quality of Low-Dose CT Colonography

Yanshan Chen,Zixuan Huang,Lijuan Feng,Wenbin Zou,Decan Kong,Dongyun Zhu,Guochao Dai,Weidong Zhao,Yuanke Zhang,Mingyue Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.01.021

IF: 5.482

2024-01-30

Academic Radiology

Abstract:Rationale and Objectives To evaluate the image quality of low-dose CT colonography (CTC) using deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) compared to iterative reconstruction (IR). Materials and Methods Adults included in the study were divided into four groups according to body mass index (BMI). Routine-dose (RD: 120 kVp) CTC images were reconstructed with IR (RD-IR); low-dose (LD: 100 kVp) images were reconstructed with IR (LD-IR) and DLR (LD-DLR). The subjective image quality was rated on a 5-point scale by two radiologists independently. The parameters for objective image quality included noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The Friedman test was used to compare the image quality among RD-IR, LD-IR and LD-DLR. The Kruskal Wallis test was used to compare the results among different BMI groups. Results A total of 270 volunteers (mean age: 47.94 years ± 11.57; 115 men) were included. The effective dose of low-dose CTC was decreased by approximately 83.18% (5.18 mSv ± 0.86 vs. 0.86 mSv ± 0.05, P < 0.001). The subjective image quality score of LD-DLR was superior to that of LD-IR (3.61 ± 0.56 vs. 2.70 ± 0.51, P < 0.001) and on par with the RD- IR's (3.61 ± 0.56 vs. 3.74 ± 0.52, P = 0.486). LD-DLR exhibited the lowest noise, and the maximum SNR and CNR compared to RD-IR and LD-IR (all P < 0.001). No statistical difference was found in the noise of LD-DLR images between different BMI groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusion Compared to IR, DLR provided low-dose CTC with superior image quality at an average radiation dose of 0.86 mSv, which may be promising in future colorectal cancer screening.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
The role of atropine as a mediator blocker of induced bronchial obstruction.

I. Itkin,S. Anand

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8707(70)90126-7

1970-03-01

Journal of Allergy

Abstract:
Application of deep learning image reconstruction in low-dose chest CT scan

Huang Wang,Lu-Lu Li,Jin Shang,Jian Song,Bin Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210380

2022-05-01

Abstract:Objective: Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) is a new reconstruction method for maintaining image quality at reduced radiation dose. The purpose of this study was to compare image quality of reduced-dose DLIR images with the standard-dose adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) images in chest CT. Methods: Our prospective study included 48 adult patients (30 women and 18 men, mean age ±SD, 49.8 ± 14.3 years) who underwent both the standard-dose CT (SDCT) and low-dose CT (LDCT) on a GE Revolution CT scanner. All patients gave written informed consent. All scans were reconstructed with ASIR-V40%. Additionally, LDCT scans were reconstructed with DLIR with high-setting (DLIR-H) and medium-setting (DLIR-M). Image noise and contrast-noise-ratio (CNR) of thoracic aorta with different reconstruction modes were measured and compared. Results: LDCT reduced radiation dose by 96% compared with SDCT (CTDIvol: 0.54mGy vs 12.46mGy). In LDCT, DLIR significantly reduced image noise compared with the state-of-the-art ASIR-V40% with DLIR-H provided the lowest image noise and highest image quality score. In addition, the image noise, CNR of aorta and overall image quality of the low-dose DLIR-H images did not have significant difference compared with the SDCT ASIR-V40% images (all p > 0.05). Conclusion: DLIR significantly reduces image noise in LDCT chest scans and provides similar image quality as the SDCT ASIR-V images at 4% of the radiation dose. Advances in knowledge: DLIR uses high-quality FBP data to train deep neural networks to learn how to distinguish between signal and noise, and effectively suppresses noise without affecting anatomical and pathological structures. It opens a new era of CT image reconstruction. DLIR significantly reduces image noise and improves image quality compared with ASIR-V40% under same radiation dose condition. DLIR-H achieves similar image quality at 4% radiation dose as ASIR-V40% at standard-dose level in non-contrast chest CT.
Application of deep-learning reconstruction algorithm for enhanced CT scan of upper abdomen under different radiation doses: focus on noise, contrast-to-noise ratio and image quality

Yanrong Xie,Yuan-Cheng Wang,Shan Huang,Shenghong Ju

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42058-021-00086-y

2021-12-02

Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology

Abstract:ObjectivesTo compare the effect of deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V) for upper abdominal-enhanced CT. The foci of this study were to validate whether the image effect of DLIR would be better than that of ASiR-V under the same dose and whether the image effect of DLIR under low dose would be not lower than that of ASiR-V under routine dose, and the two algorithms were studied from different layer thickness.MethodsA total of 17 patients with hepatic lesions undergoing upper abdominal-enhanced CT examination were randomly divided into two groups: low dose (LD, n = 7) with 150 mAs and ultralow dose (ULD, n = 10) with 100 mAs; routine dose (RD) scans were subsequently performed in both groups (n = 17). Images were reconstructed with DLIR with low, medium, and high strength (DL-L, -M, and -H, respectively) and ASiR-V with standard 30% and 70% (ASiR-V 30% and 70%) on thin (0.625 mm) and thick (5 mm) slices. Noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements were performed. Two radiologists, blinded to examination details, scored four categories of image quality while comparing reconstructions for vascular significance, image noise and texture, lesion conspicuity and lesion diagnosis confidence.ResultsUnder the same dose, DLIR had better performance in noise, CNR and image quality scores than ASiR-V did, DL-H performed the best. Under different radiation doses, ULD-DL-M did not differ significantly from RD-ASiR-V 30% in noise and CNR (P > 0.05), but had lower image quality scores (P < 0.05). Noise, CNR and image quality scores of the LD-DL-H were comparable to those of RD-ASiR-V 30% (P > 0.05).ConclusionDLIR can significantly improve the image quality of enhanced abdominal CT under the same dose. By decreasing the radiation dose to 150mAs, DL-H showed comparable image quality to that of RD-ASiR-V 30%.
Radiation and iodine dose reduced thoraco-abdomino-pelvic dual-energy CT at 40 keV reconstructed with deep learning image reconstruction.

H. Kato,Rena Miyase,Y. Noda,T. Miyoshi,F. Hyodo,M. Matsuo,N. Kawai,T. Kaga,Ken Iwashima,Tomotaka Kawamura,Akikazu Kobori

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211163

2022-03-01

British Journal of Radiology

Abstract:OBJECTIVES To evaluate the feasibility of a simultaneous reduction of radiation and iodine doses in dual-energy thoraco-abdomino-pelvic CT reconstructed with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR). METHODS Thoraco-abdomino-pelvic CT was prospectively performed in 111 participants; 52 participants underwent a standard-dose single-energy CT with a standard iodine dose (600 mgI/kg; SD group), while 59 underwent a low-dose dual-energy CT with a reduced iodine dose (300 mgI/kg; double low-dose [DLD] group). CT data were reconstructed with a hybrid iterative reconstruction in the SD group and a high-strength level of DLIR at 40 keV in the DLD group. Two radiologists measured the CT numbers of the descending and abdominal aorta, portal vein, hepatic vein, inferior vena cava, liver, pancreas, spleen, and kidney, and background noise. Two other radiologists assessed diagnostic acceptability using a five-point scale. The CT dose-index volumes (CTDIvol), iodine weight, CT numbers of anatomical structures, background noise, and diagnostic acceptability were compared between the two groups using Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS The median CTDIvol (10 mGy; interquartile range [IQR], 9-13 mGy vs 4 mGy; IQR, 4-5 mGy) and median iodine weight (35 g; IQR, 31-38 g vs 16 g; IQR, 14-18 g) were lower in the DLD group than in the SD group (p < 0.001 for each). The CT numbers of all anatomical structures and background noise were higher in the DLD group than in the SD group (p < 0.001 for all). The diagnostic image quality was obtained in 100% (52/52) of participants in the SD group and 95% (56/59) of participants in the DLD group. CONCLUSION Monoenergetic images at 40 keV with DLIR could achieve half doses of radiation and iodine while maintaining diagnostic image quality. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Virtual monochromatic images at 40 keV reconstructed with deep learning image reconstruction algorithm allowed to reduce the doses of radiation and iodine while maintaining diagnostic image quality.

Medicine,Engineering
75% radiation dose reduction using deep learning reconstruction on low-dose chest CT

Gyeong Deok Jo,Chulkyun Ahn,Jung Hee Hong,Da Som Kim,Jongsoo Park,Hyungjin Kim,Jong Hyo Kim,Jin Mo Goo,Ju Gang Nam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01081-8

2023-09-11

Abstract:Objective: Few studies have explored the clinical feasibility of using deep-learning reconstruction to reduce the radiation dose of CT. We aimed to compare the image quality and lung nodule detectability between chest CT using a quarter of the low dose (QLD) reconstructed with vendor-agnostic deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and conventional low-dose (LD) CT reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR). Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected 100 patients (median age, 61 years [IQR, 53-70 years]) who received LDCT using a dual-source scanner, where total radiation was split into a 1:3 ratio. QLD CT was generated using a quarter dose and reconstructed with DLIR (QLD-DLIR), while LDCT images were generated using a full dose and reconstructed with IR (LD-IR). Three thoracic radiologists reviewed subjective noise, spatial resolution, and overall image quality, and image noise was measured in five areas. The radiologists were also asked to detect all Lung-RADS category 3 or 4 nodules, and their performance was evaluated using area under the jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic curve (AUFROC). Results: The median effective dose was 0.16 (IQR, 0.14-0.18) mSv for QLD CT and 0.65 (IQR, 0.57-0.71) mSv for LDCT. The radiologists' evaluations showed no significant differences in subjective noise (QLD-DLIR vs. LD-IR, lung-window setting; 3.23 ± 0.19 vs. 3.27 ± 0.22; P = .11), spatial resolution (3.14 ± 0.28 vs. 3.16 ± 0.27; P = .12), and overall image quality (3.14 ± 0.21 vs. 3.17 ± 0.17; P = .15). QLD-DLIR demonstrated lower measured noise than LD-IR in most areas (P < .001 for all). No significant difference was found between QLD-DLIR and LD-IR for the sensitivity (76.4% vs. 72.2%; P = .35) or the AUFROCs (0.77 vs. 0.78; P = .68) in detecting Lung-RADS category 3 or 4 nodules. Under a noninferiority limit of -0.1, QLD-DLIR showed noninferior detection performance (95% CI for AUFROC difference, -0.04 to 0.06). Conclusion: QLD-DLIR images showed comparable image quality and noninferior nodule detectability relative to LD-IR images.
A feasibility study of realizing low-dose abdominal CT using deep learning image reconstruction algorithm.

Jian Song,Lu-Lu Li,Jin Shang,Huang Wang,Bin Liu,Xiao-Ying Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-200826

2021-02-18

Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology

Abstract:OBJECTIVES To explore the feasibility of achieving diagnostic images in low-dose abdominal CT using a Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm. METHODS Prospectively enrolled 47 patients requiring contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans. The late-arterial phase scan was added and acquired using lower-dose mode (tube current range, 175-545 mA; 80 kVp for patients with BMI ≤24 kg/m2 and 100 kVp for patients with BMI > 24 kg/m2) and reconstructed with DLIR at medium setting (DLIR-M) and high setting (DLIR-H), ASIR-V at 0% (FBP), 40% and 80% strength. Both the quantitative measurement and qualitative analysis of the five types of reconstruction methods were compared. In addition, radiation dose and image quality between the early-arterial phase ASIR-V images using standard-dose and the late-arterial phase DLIR images using low-dose were compared. RESULTS For the late-arterial phase, all five reconstructions had similar CT value (P > 0.05). DLIR-H, DLIR-M and ASIR-V80% images significantly reduced the image noise and improved the image contrast noise ratio, compared with the standard ASIR-V40% images (P < 0.05). ASIR-V80% images had undesirable image characteristics with obvious "waxy" artifacts, while DLIR-H images maintained high spatial resolution and had the highest subjective image quality. Compared with the early-arterial scans, the late-arterial phase scans significantly reduced the radiation dose (P < 0.05), while the DLIR-H images exhibited lower image noise and good display of the specific image details of lesions. CONCLUSIONS DLIR algorithm improves image quality under low-dose scan condition and may be used to reduce the radiation dose without adversely affecting the image quality.

Medicine,Computer Science,Engineering
Development of a sensitive, colorometric microarray assay for allergen-responsive human IgE.

Stewart J. Lebrun,W. Petchpud,A. Hui,C. McLaughlin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JIM.2005.01.019

2005-05-01

Abstract:
Deep Learning Versus Iterative Reconstruction for CT Pulmonary Angiography in the Emergency Setting: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose

Marc Lenfant,Olivier Chevallier,Pierre-Olivier Comby,Grégory Secco,Karim Haioun,Frédéric Ricolfi,Brivaël Lemogne,Romaric Loffroy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10080558

IF: 3.6

2020-08-04

Diagnostics

Abstract:To compare image quality and the radiation dose of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) subjected to the first deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLR) (50%) algorithm, with images subjected to the hybrid-iterative reconstruction (IR) technique (50%). One hundred forty patients who underwent CTPA for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) between 2018 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Image quality was assessed quantitatively (image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)) and qualitatively (on a 5-point scale). Radiation dose parameters (CT dose index, CTDIvol; and dose-length product, DLP) were also recorded. Ninety-three patients were finally analyzed, 48 with hybrid-IR and 45 with DLR images. The image noise was significantly lower and the SNR (24.4 ± 5.9 vs. 20.7 ± 6.1) and CNR (21.8 ± 5.8 vs. 18.6 ± 6.0) were significantly higher on DLR than hybrid-IR images (p < 0.01). DLR images received a significantly higher score than hybrid-IR images for image quality, with both soft (4.4 ± 0.7 vs. 3.8 ± 0.8) and lung (4.1 ± 0.7 vs. 3.6 ± 0.9) filters (p < 0.01). No difference in diagnostic confidence level for PE between both techniques was found. CTDIvol (4.8 ± 1.4 vs. 4.0 ± 1.2 mGy) and DLP (157.9 ± 44.9 vs. 130.8 ± 41.2 mGy∙cm) were lower on DLR than hybrid-IR images. DLR both significantly improved the image quality and reduced the radiation dose of CTPA examinations as compared to the hybrid-IR technique.

medicine, general & internal
The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images

Jiu-Ming Jiang,Lei Miao,Xin Liang,Zhuo-Heng Liu,Li Zhang,Meng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102560

IF: 3.6

2022-10-22

Diagnostics

Abstract:This study aimed to evaluate the value of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm (GE Healthcare's TrueFidelityTM) in improving the image quality of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest. First, we retrospectively extracted raw data of chest LDCT from 50 patients and reconstructed them by using model-based adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo at 50% (ASIR-V 50%) and DLIR at medium and high strengths (DLIR-M and DLIR-H). Three sets of images were obtained. Next, two radiographers measured the mean CT value/image signal and standard deviation (SD) in Hounsfield units at the region of interest (ROI) and calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Two radiologists subjectively evaluated the image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. The differences between the groups of data were analyzed through a repeated measures ANOVA or the Friedman test. Last, our result show that the three reconstructions did not differ significantly in signal (p > 0.05) but had significant differences in noise, SNR, and CNR (p < 0.001). The subjective scores significantly differed among the three reconstruction modalities in soft tissue (p 0.05). DLIR-H had the best noise reduction ability and improved SNR and CNR without distorting the image texture, followed by DLIR-M and ASIR-V 50%. In summary, DLIR can provide a higher image quality at the same dose, enhancing the physicians' diagnostic confidence and improving the diagnostic efficacy of LDCT for lung cancer screening.

medicine, general & internal
Deep learning image reconstruction for improving image quality of contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT in abdomen

Mineka Sato,Yasutaka Ichikawa,Kensuke Domae,Kazuya Yoshikawa,Yoshinori Kanii,Akio Yamazaki,Naoki Nagasawa,Motonori Nagata,Masaki Ishida,Hajime Sakuma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08647-0

IF: 7.034

2022-03-03

European Radiology

Abstract:ObjectivesTo evaluate the usefulness of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) to improve the image quality of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) of the abdomen, compared to hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR).MethodsThis study included 40 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT of the abdomen. Virtual monochromatic 40-, 50-, and 70-keV and iodine density images were reconstructed using three reconstruction algorithms, including hybrid IR (ASiR-V50%) and DLIR (TrueFidelity) at medium- and high-strength level (DLIR-M and DLIR-H, respectively). The standard deviation of attenuation in liver parenchyma was measured as image noise. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for the portal vein on portal venous phase CT was calculated. The vessel conspicuity and overall image quality were graded on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). The comparative scale of lesion conspicuity in 47 abdominal solid lesions was evaluated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (best) to −4 (markedly inferior).ResultsThe image noise of virtual monochromatic 40-, 50 -, and 70-keV and iodine density images was significantly decreased by DLIR compared to hybrid IR (p < 0.0001). The CNR was significantly higher in DLIR-H and DLIR-M than in hybrid IR (p < 0.0001). The vessel conspicuity and overall image quality scores were also significantly greater in DLIR-H and DLIR-M than in hybrid IR (p < 0.05). The lesion conspicuity scores for DLIR-M and DLIR-H were significantly higher than those for hybrid IR in the virtual monochromatic image of all energy levels (p ≤ 0.001).ConclusionsDLIR improves vessel conspicuity, CNR, and lesion conspicuity of virtual monochromatic and iodine density images in abdominal contrast-enhanced DECT, compared to hybrid IR.Key Points• Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) is useful for reducing image noise and improving the CNR of visual monochromatic 40-, 50-, and 70-keV images in dual-energy CT.• DLIR can improve lesion conspicuity of abdominal solid lesions on virtual monochromatic images compared to hybrid iterative reconstruction.• DLIR can also be applied to iodine density maps and significantly improves their image quality.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Reducing both radiation and contrast doses for overweight patients in coronary CT angiography with 80-kVp and deep learning image reconstruction

Wanjiang Li,Haiyan Lu,Yuting Wen,Minggang Zhou,Tao Shuai,Yongchun You,Jin Zhao,Kai Liao,Chunyan Lu,Jianying Li,Zhenlin Li,Kaiyue Diao,Yong He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110736

IF: 4.531

2023-02-12

European Journal of Radiology

Abstract:Purpose To investigate the use of an 80-kVp tube voltage combined with a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm in coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for overweight patients to reduce radiation and contrast doses in comparison with the 120 kVp protocol and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V). Methods One hundred consecutive CCTA patients were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a low-dose group (n=50) with 80 kVp, smart mA for noise index (NI) of 36 HU, contrast dose rate of 18 mgI/kg/s and DLIR and 60% ASIR-V and a standard-dose group (n=50) with 120 kVp, smart mA for NI of 25 HU, contrast dose rate of 32 mgI/kg/s and 60% ASIR-V. The radiation and contrast dose, subjective image quality score, attenuation values, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared. Results The low-dose group achieved a significant reduction in the effective radiation dose (1.01 ± 0.45 mSv vs. 1.85 ± 0.40 mSv, P <0.001) and contrast dose (33.69 ± 3.87 mL vs. 59.11 ± 5.60 mL, P <0.001) compared to the standard-dose group. The low-dose group with DLIR presented similar enhancement but lower noise, higher SNR and CNR and higher subjective quality scores than the standard-dose group. Moreover, the same patient comparison in the low-dose group between different reconstructions showed that DLIR images had slightly and consistently higher CT values in small vessels, indicating better defined vessels, much lower image noise, higher SNR and CNR and higher subjective quality scores than ASIR-V images (all P <0.001). Conclusions The application of 80 kVp and DLIR allows for significant radiation and dose reduction while further improving image quality in CCTA for overweight patients.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Design and implementation of parallel-IDT surface acoustic waves (SAW) low loss RF filters

H. Ou,M. Zaghloul

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2009.5117738

2009-05-24

Abstract:In this work, we study the design and implementation of a parallel-IDT surface acoustic wave (SAW) filter for telecommunication applications. The equivalent circuit and 3D model are established to understand acoustoelectric interactions. The 1280 Y-Z rotated LiNbO3 which has high electromechanical coupling constant is used as the piezoelectric material to generate the acoustic waves. The single-IDT and parallel IDT SAW filters were implemented in 122 MHz. The parallel-IDT SAW filter has an Insertion Loss to −5.515dB, larger than the single-IDT SAW filter.
Computed Tomography Effective Dose and Image Quality in Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Intensive Care Patients Compared to Iterative Algorithms

Emilio Quaia,Elena Kiyomi Lanza de Cristoforis,Elena Agostini,Chiara Zanon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography10060069

2024-06-07

Tomography

Abstract:Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithms employ convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for CT image reconstruction to produce CT images with a very low noise level, even at a low radiation dose. The aim of this study was to assess whether the DLIR algorithm reduces the CT effective dose (ED) and improves CT image quality in comparison with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We identified all consecutive patients referred to the ICU of a single hospital who underwent at least two consecutive chest and/or abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scans within a time period of 30 days using DLIR and subsequently the FBP or IR algorithm (Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction [ADMIRE] model-based algorithm or Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D [AIDR 3D] hybrid algorithm) for CT image reconstruction. The radiation ED, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were compared between the different CT scanners. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for statistical comparison. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. A total of 83 patients (mean age, 59 ± 15 years [standard deviation]; 56 men) were included. DLIR vs. FBP reduced the ED (18.45 ± 13.16 mSv vs. 22.06 ± 9.55 mSv, p < 0.05), while DLIR vs. FBP and vs. ADMIRE and AIDR 3D IR algorithms reduced image noise (8.45 ± 3.24 vs. 14.85 ± 2.73 vs. 14.77 ± 32.77 and 11.17 ± 32.77, p < 0.05) and increased the SNR (11.53 ± 9.28 vs. 3.99 ± 1.23 vs. 5.84 ± 2.74 and 3.58 ± 2.74, p < 0.05). CT scanners employing DLIR improved the SNR compared to CT scanners using FBP or IR algorithms in ICU patients despite maintaining a reduced ED.
Comparison of image quality and lesion diagnosis in abdominopelvic unenhanced CT between reduced-dose CT using deep learning post-processing and standard-dose CT using iterative reconstruction: A prospective study

Xiao Wang,Fuling Zheng,Ran Xiao,Zhuoheng Liu,Yutong Li,Juan Li,Xi Zhang,Xuemin Hao,Xinhu Zhang,Jiawu Guo,Yan Zhang,Huadan Xue,Zhengyu Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109735

IF: 4.531

2021-01-01

European Journal of Radiology

Abstract:Purpose: To compare image quality and lesion diagnosis between reduced-dose abdominopelvic unenhanced computed tomography (CT) using deep learning (DL) post-processing and standard-dose CT using iterative reconstruction (IR). Method: Totally 251 patients underwent two consecutive abdominopelvic unenhanced CT scans of the same range, including standard and reduced doses, respectively. In group A, standard-dose data were reconstructed by (blend 30 %) IR. In group B, reduced-dose data were reconstructed by filtered back projection reconstruction to obtain group B1 images, and post-processed using the DL algorithm (NeuAI denosing, Neusoft medical, Shenyang, China) with 50 % and 100 % weights to obtain group B2 and B3 images, respectively. Then, CT values of the liver, the second lumbar vertebral centrum, the erector spinae and abdominal subcutaneous fat were measured. CT values, noise levels, signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs), radiation doses and subjective scores of image quality were compared. Subjective evaluations of low-density liver lesions were compared by diagnostic results from enhanced CT or Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Results: Groups B3 and B1 showed the lowest and highest noise levels, respectively (P < 0.001). The SNR and CNR in group B3 were highest (P < 0.001). The radiation dose in group B was reduced by 71.5 % on average compared to group A. Subjective scores in groups A and B2 were highest (P < 0.001). Diagnostic sensitivity and confidence for liver metastases in groups A and B2 were highest (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Reduced-dose abdominopelvic unenhanced CT combined with DL post-processing could ensure image quality and satisfy diagnostic needs.
Improving Image Quality and Nodule Characterization in Ultra-low-dose Lung CT with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction

Guangming Ma,Yuequn Dou,Shan Dang,Nan Yu,Yanbing Guo,Dong Han,Qiuju Fan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.01.010

IF: 5.482

2024-03-02

Academic Radiology

Abstract:Rationale and Objective To investigate the influence of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on the image quality and quantitative analysis of pulmonary nodules under ultra-low dose lung CT conditions. Materials and Methods This was a prospective study with patient consent and included 56 patients with suspected pulmonary nodules. Patients were examined by both standard-dose CT (SDCT) and ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT). SDCT images were reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V 40% (ASIR-V40%) (group A), while ULDCT images were reconstructed using ASIR-V40% (group B) and high-strength DLIR (DLIR-H) (group C). The three image sets were analyzed using a commercial computer aided diagnosis (CAD) software. Parameters such as nodule length, width, density, volume, risk, and classification were measured. The CAD quantitative data of different nodule types (solid, calcified, and subsolid nodules) and nodule image quality scores evaluated by two physicians on a 5-point scale were compared. Result The radiation dose in ULDCT was 0.25 ± 0.08mSv, 7.2% that of the 3.48 ± 1.08mSv in SDCT (P < 0.001). 104 pulmonary nodules were detected (51/53 solid, 26/24 calcified and 27/27 subsolid in Groups A and (B&C), respectively). Group B had lower density for solid, calcified nodules, and lower volume and risk for subsolid nodules than Group A, while Group C had lower density for calcified nodules (P 0.05). Group A and C had similar image quality for nodules and were higher than Group B (P < 0.05). Conclusion DLIR-H significantly improves image quality than ASIR-V40% and maintains similar nodule detection and characterization with CAD in ULDCT compared to SDCT.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
A Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Improving Image Quality and Hepatic Lesion Detectability in Abdominal Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Preliminary Results

Bingqian Chu,Lu Gan,Yi Shen,Jian Song,Ling Liu,Jianying Li,Bin Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-023-00893-y

IF: 4.903

2023-08-16

Journal of Digital Imaging

Abstract:This study aimed to compare the performance of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) in improving image quality and diagnostic performance using virtual monochromatic spectral images in abdominal dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). Sixty-two patients [mean age ± standard deviation (SD): 56 years ± 13; 30 men] who underwent abdominal DECT were prospectively included in this study. The 70-keV DECT images in the portal phase were reconstructed at 5-mm and 1.25-mm slice thicknesses with 40% ASIR-V (ASIR-V40%) and at 1.25-mm slice with deep learning image reconstruction at medium (DLIR-M) and high (DLIR-H) levels and then compared. Computed tomography (CT) attenuation, SD values, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured in the liver, spleen, erector spinae, and intramuscular fat. The lesions in each reconstruction group at 1.25-mm slice thickness were counted. The image quality and diagnostic confidence were subjectively evaluated by two radiologists using a 5-point scale. For the 1.25-mm images, DLIR-M and DLIR-H had lower SD, higher SNR and CNR, and better subjective image quality compared with ASIR-V40%; DLIR-H performed the best (all P values < 0.001). Furthermore, the 1.25-mm DLIR-H images had similar SD, SNR, and CNR values as the 5-mm ASIR-V40% images (all P > 0.05). Three image groups had similar lesion detection rates, but DLIR groups exhibited higher confidence in diagnosing lesions. Compared with ASIR-V40% at 70 keV, 70-keV DECT with DLIR-H further reduced image noise and improved image quality. Additionally, it improved diagnostic confidence while ensuring a consistent lesion detection rate of liver lesions.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Improving image quality of triple-low-protocol renal artery CT angiography with deep-learning image reconstruction: a comparative study with standard-dose single-energy and dual-energy CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction

Z. Meng,Y. Guo,S. Deng,Q. Xiang,J. Cao,Y. Zhang,K. Zhang,K. Ma,S. Xie,Z. Kang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.01.008

IF: 3.389

2024-01-25

Clinical Radiology

Abstract:Aim To investigate the improvement in image quality of triple-low-protocol (low radiation, low contrast medium dose, low injection speed) renal artery computed tomography (CT) angiography (RACTA) using deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR), in comparison with standard-dose single- and dual-energy CT (DECT) using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) algorithm. Materials And Methods Ninety patients for RACTA were divided into different groups: standard-dose single-energy CT (S group) using ASIR-V at 60% strength (60%ASIR-V), DECT (DE group) with 60%ASIR-V including virtual monochromatic images at 40 keV (DE40 group) and 70 keV (DE70 group), and the triple-low protocol single-energy CT (L group) with DLIR at high level (DLIR-H). The effective dose (ED), contrast medium dose, injection speed, standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of abdominal aorta (AA), and left/right renal artery (LRA, RRA), and subjective scores were compared among the different groups. Results The L group significantly reduced ED by 37.6% and 31.2%, contrast medium dose by 33.9% and 30.5%, and injection speed by 30% and 30%, respectively, compared to the S and DE groups. The L group had the lowest SD values for all arteries compared to the other groups ( p <0.001). The SNR of RRA and LRA in the L group, and the CNR of all arteries in the DE40 group had highest value compared to others ( p <0.05). The L group had the best comprehensive score with good consistency ( p <0.05). Conclusions The triple-low protocol RACTA with DLIR-H significantly reduces the ED, contrast medium doses, and injection speed, while providing good comprehensive image quality.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality and lesion visibility in renal computed tomography at different doses

Yifan Bie,Shuo Yang,Xingchao Li,Kun Zhao,Changlei Zhang,Hai Zhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-852

2023-04-01

Abstract:Background: Numerous computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction algorithms have been developed to improve image quality, and high-quality renal CT images are crucial to clinical diagnosis. This study evaluated the image quality and lesion visibility of deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V) in contrast-enhanced renal CT at different reconstruction strengths and doses. Methods: From January 2020 to May 2021, we prospectively included 101 patients who underwent renal contrast-enhanced CT scanning (69 at 120 kV; 32 at 80 kV). All image data were reconstructed with ASiR-V (30% and 70%) and DLIR at low, medium, and high reconstruction strengths (DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H, respectively). The CT number, noise, noise reduction rate (NRR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), overall image quality, and the proportion of acceptable images were compared. Lesions of DLIR groups were evaluated, and the conspicuity-to-noise ratio (C/N) was calculated. Results: Quantitative values (noise, SNR, CNR, and NRR) significantly differed between all reconstructions at 120 and 80 kV (P<0.001) and between each reconstruction, except ASiR-V 70% vs. DLIR-M. At 120 kV, the overall image quality and the proportion of acceptable images significantly differed between all reconstructions (P<0.001) and between each reconstruction, except ASiR-V 30% vs. DLIR-L and ASiR-V 70% vs. DLIR-M. At 80 kV, the overall image quality significantly differed between all reconstructions (P<0.001) and between each reconstruction, except between ASiR-V 30%, ASiR-V 70%, and DLIR-L. Quantitative and qualitative values were highest in DLIR-H, while the values were close in DLIR-H (80 kV) vs. ASiR-V 70% (120 kV) and DLIR-M (80 kV) vs. ASiR-V 30% (120 kV). The lesion conspicuity and noise significantly differed in DLIR at 120 kV and 80 kV (P<0.001). C/N significantly differed in DLIR at 120 kV (P<0.001) but not at 80 kV. DLIR-L and DLIR-M exhibited much-improved lesion display (C/N >1), and DLIR-H exhibited much-improved noise (C/N <1) at 120 kV. Conclusions: DLIR significantly improved the image quality and lesion visibility of renal CT compared with ASiR-V, even at a low dose.

Evaluation of catch-up growth from orthodontic treatment and supplemental growth hormone therapy by using Z-scores.

P352 Comparison of Radiation Dose, Image Quality, and Diagnostic Performance between Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction and Deep Learning Reconstruction for CT Enterography of IBD

Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Improves the Image Quality of Low-Dose CT Colonography

The role of atropine as a mediator blocker of induced bronchial obstruction.

Application of deep learning image reconstruction in low-dose chest CT scan

Application of deep-learning reconstruction algorithm for enhanced CT scan of upper abdomen under different radiation doses: focus on noise, contrast-to-noise ratio and image quality

Radiation and iodine dose reduced thoraco-abdomino-pelvic dual-energy CT at 40 keV reconstructed with deep learning image reconstruction.

75% radiation dose reduction using deep learning reconstruction on low-dose chest CT

A feasibility study of realizing low-dose abdominal CT using deep learning image reconstruction algorithm.

Development of a sensitive, colorometric microarray assay for allergen-responsive human IgE.

Deep Learning Versus Iterative Reconstruction for CT Pulmonary Angiography in the Emergency Setting: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose

The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images

Deep learning image reconstruction for improving image quality of contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT in abdomen

Reducing both radiation and contrast doses for overweight patients in coronary CT angiography with 80-kVp and deep learning image reconstruction

Design and implementation of parallel-IDT surface acoustic waves (SAW) low loss RF filters

Computed Tomography Effective Dose and Image Quality in Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Intensive Care Patients Compared to Iterative Algorithms

Comparison of image quality and lesion diagnosis in abdominopelvic unenhanced CT between reduced-dose CT using deep learning post-processing and standard-dose CT using iterative reconstruction: A prospective study

Improving Image Quality and Nodule Characterization in Ultra-low-dose Lung CT with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction

A Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Improving Image Quality and Hepatic Lesion Detectability in Abdominal Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Preliminary Results

Improving image quality of triple-low-protocol renal artery CT angiography with deep-learning image reconstruction: a comparative study with standard-dose single-energy and dual-energy CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction

Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality and lesion visibility in renal computed tomography at different doses