Adherence to AUA guidelines for the work‐up, medical management, surgical evaluation and treatment of BPH: Work from a quality improvement collaborative

Eric Wahlstedt,John Lee Graves,John Wahlstedt,Alison D'Alessandro,Will Cranford,Nicholas A. Freidberg,Amul Bhalodi,John R. Bell,Andrew James,Jason Bylund,Stephen E. Strup,Andrew Harris
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12526
2024-06-12
LUTS Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Abstract:Introduction Previous studies noted varied adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), but studies are yet to quantify adherence to American Urological Association BPH guidelines. We studied guideline adherence in the context of a new quality improvement collaborative (QIC). Methods Data were collected as part of a statewide QIC. Medical records for patients undergoing select CPT codes from January 2020 to May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed for adherence to selected BPH guidelines. Results Most men were treated with transurethral resection of the prostate. Notably, 53.3% of men completed an IPSS and 52.3% had a urinalysis. 4.7% were counseled on behavioral modifications, 15.0% on medical therapy, and 100% on procedural options. For management, 79.4% were taking alpha‐blockers and 59.8% were taking a 5‐ARI. For evaluation, 57% had a PVR, 63.6% had prostate size measurement, 37.4% had uroflowmetry, and 12.3% were counseled about treatment failure. Postoperatively, 51.6% completed an IPSS, 57% had a PVR, 6.50% had uroflowmetry, 50.6% stopped their alpha‐blocker, and 75.0% stopped their 5‐ARI. Conclusions There was adherence to preoperative testing recommendations, but patient counseling was lacking in the initial work‐up and preoperative evaluation. We will convey the data to key stakeholders, expand data collection to other institutions, and devise an improvement implementation plan.
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?