Poor clinical guideline adherence and inappropriate testing for incident lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Charles Welliver,Lydia Feinstein,Julia B Ward,Ziya Kirkali,Erline E Martinez-Miller,Brian R Matlaga,Kevin McVary
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00435-z
Abstract:Background: The American Urological Association makes recommendations for evaluation and testing for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) to help primary care providers and specialists identify LUTS/BPH and harmful related conditions including urinary retention and prostate or bladder cancer. Our understanding of provider adherence to these Guidelines is limited to single-site or nonrepresentative settings. Methods: We analyzed two insurance claims databases: the Optum® de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart database for privately insured males aged 40-64 years (N ≈ 1,650,900 annually) and the Medicare 5% Sample for males aged ≥65 years (N ≈ 546,000 annually). We calculated the annual prevalence of LUTS/BPH and comorbid bladder cancer and bladder stones from 2004 to 2013. We additionally examined LUTS/BPH incidence and adherence to testing guidelines in a cohort of men newly diagnosed with LUTS/BPH in 2009. Results: While LUTS/BPH prevalence and incidence increased with increasing age, evaluation testing became less common. Urinalysis was the most common testing type but was performed in <60% of incident patients. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was the second most common test across age groups (range: 15-34%). Prevalence of comorbid bladder cancer (range: 0-4%), but not bladder stones (range: 1-2%), increased with increasing age. Conclusions: Although older men were at greater risk of LUTS/BPH than younger men, they were less likely to undergo testing at diagnosis. Recommended testing with urinalysis was poor despite higher prevalence of bladder cancer in older men and a standard recommendation for urinalysis since 1994. Providers should be more cognizant of AUA Guidelines when assessing LUTS/BPH patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?