EP08.05: Evaluating an algorithm to enable a consistent approach to manage fetal growth

L.J. Stocker,A.J. Kermack,F. Tomlinson,R. Parasuraman,D.T. Howe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28333

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 185-185, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

OP05.08: The introduction of a fetal growth decision‐tool to improve consistency in management of ultrasound findings in late pregnancy

L.J. Stocker,A.J. Kermack,F. Tomlinson,R. Parasuraman,D.T. Howe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27914

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 72-73, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP01.64: What the clinicians think: the use of a growth parameter decision tool to help standardise care for women having ultrasounds

L.J. Stocker,F. Tomlinson,R. Parasuraman,D.T. Howe,A.J. Kermack

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28077

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 126-126, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.51: Machine learning methods to predict fetal growth restriction: a systematic review

G. Zamagni,L. Monasta,C. Lees,T. Stampalija

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28379

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 197-197, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.08: Improving estimated fetal weight accuracy at a tertiary centre: a quality improvement intervention

Z. AlSomali,L. Halawani,T. Zhang,A. Werlang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28336

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 186-186, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.14: Computerised CTG features in small for gestational age and fetal growth restriction between 32+0 and 36+6 weeks

A. Dall'Asta,T. Nguyen,G. Morganelli,S. Sorrentino,E. Corno,G.M. Celora,B. Valentini,P. D'Amario,M. Capurso,M. Baffa,C. Melito,T. Ghi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28342

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 187-188, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.36: Estimated fetal weight: reassessing our accuracy

T. Hanton,R. Hughes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28364

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 193-193, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.11: Prenatal ultrasound for fetal growth assessment in obese women

M. Dinu,R. Capitanescu,C. Marinas,F. Tanase,O. Sirbu,R.C. Pana,S. Tudorache

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28339

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 186-187, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.10: Sonographic surveillance and perinatal outcomes among pregnancies with periviable fetal growth restriction

F.V. LeMoine,A.C. Ranzini,M. Imbroane,E. Ghosalkar,D. Hackney,E. Hamburg‐Shields

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28338

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 186-186, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.13: Evaluation of fetal growth charts: a comparative study in a local population

D. Nemescu,I. Tanasa,A. Carp,A. Tanase,A. Cristofor,D. Zelinschi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28341

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 187-187, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.34: Complete fetal biometry with 3D ultrasound and image recognition: prospective assessment of reliability and agreement with 2D measurements

G. Ambroise Grandjean

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28362

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 192-193, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.43: Sonographic surveillance and neonatal outcomes among pregnancies with periviable fetal growth restriction

F.V. LeMoine,A.C. Ranzini,M. Imbroane,E. Ghosalkar,D. Hackney,E. Hamburg‐Shields

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28371

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 195-195, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.15: Soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase 1 for the prediction of small for gestational age

L.E. Markel,K. Pressman,C.V. Schenone,M.M. Aziz,A. Odibo,J.R. Duncan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28343

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 188-188, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.24: Fetal biometry growth from first to second trimester and prediction of stillbirth risk

L. Lindström,O. Stephansson,S. Cnattingius,A. Wilcox,M. Granfors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28352

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 191-191, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP01.41: Performance of an AI software in automatic detection of quality criteria and characteristics on fetal ultrasound images

J. Stirnemann,V. Debavelaere,G. Corda,N. Matevski,F. Loge,C. Amabile,C. Snell,M. Marquez,K.R. Faulk,V.C. Romero,M. Spiliopoulos,L. Ghulmiyyah,N. Fries,E. Spaggiari,Y. Ville

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28055

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 118-119, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.06: Maternal and fetal characteristics in large‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses

M. Barati,S. Janaki,R. Mohammad Jafari,N.N. Saadati,E. Farhadi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28334

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 185-185, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.01: Prediction of large‐for‐gestational‐age neonates at 35–37weeks

M. Lopian,S. Prasad,E. Segal,A. Elmalech,A. Khalil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28329

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 183-184, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.47: Evaluation and interest of bone maturation during fetal ultrasound

M. Sarreau,S. Berenguer,F. Sauvestre,V. Goua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28375

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 196-196, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.17: Variations in first trimester fetal growth in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology

E.B. Seljeflot,H. Mørch,T.M. Eggebø,S. Opdahl,S. Saravelos,H. Schilling,K. Westvik‐Johari,B.H. Kahrs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28345

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 189-189, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
OP01.08: Value of adding angiogenic factors to ultrasound Doppler criteria in the definition of fetal growth restriction

L. Youssef,F. Crispi,S. Paolucci,J. Miranda,S.M. Lobmaier,F. Crovetto,F. Figueras,E. Gratacos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27881

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 61-61, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.03: First trimester fetal size in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology compared to reference curves

E.B. Seljeflot,H. Mørch,T.M. Eggebø,S. Opdahl,S. Saravelos,H. Schilling,K. Westvik‐Johari,B.H. Kahrs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28331

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 184-184, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics

EP08.05: Evaluating an algorithm to enable a consistent approach to manage fetal growth

OP05.08: The introduction of a fetal growth decision‐tool to improve consistency in management of ultrasound findings in late pregnancy

EP01.64: What the clinicians think: the use of a growth parameter decision tool to help standardise care for women having ultrasounds

EP08.51: Machine learning methods to predict fetal growth restriction: a systematic review

EP08.08: Improving estimated fetal weight accuracy at a tertiary centre: a quality improvement intervention

EP08.14: Computerised CTG features in small for gestational age and fetal growth restriction between 32+0 and 36+6 weeks

EP08.36: Estimated fetal weight: reassessing our accuracy

EP08.11: Prenatal ultrasound for fetal growth assessment in obese women

EP08.10: Sonographic surveillance and perinatal outcomes among pregnancies with periviable fetal growth restriction

EP08.13: Evaluation of fetal growth charts: a comparative study in a local population

EP08.34: Complete fetal biometry with 3D ultrasound and image recognition: prospective assessment of reliability and agreement with 2D measurements

EP08.43: Sonographic surveillance and neonatal outcomes among pregnancies with periviable fetal growth restriction

EP08.15: Soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase 1 for the prediction of small for gestational age

EP08.24: Fetal biometry growth from first to second trimester and prediction of stillbirth risk

EP01.41: Performance of an AI software in automatic detection of quality criteria and characteristics on fetal ultrasound images

EP08.06: Maternal and fetal characteristics in large‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses

EP08.01: Prediction of large‐for‐gestational‐age neonates at 35–37weeks

EP08.47: Evaluation and interest of bone maturation during fetal ultrasound

EP08.17: Variations in first trimester fetal growth in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology

OP01.08: Value of adding angiogenic factors to ultrasound Doppler criteria in the definition of fetal growth restriction

EP08.03: First trimester fetal size in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology compared to reference curves