EP08.15: Soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase 1 for the prediction of small for gestational age

L.E. Markel,K. Pressman,C.V. Schenone,M.M. Aziz,A. Odibo,J.R. Duncan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28343

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 188-188, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

EP08.01: Prediction of large‐for‐gestational‐age neonates at 35–37weeks

M. Lopian,S. Prasad,E. Segal,A. Elmalech,A. Khalil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28329

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 183-184, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.21: Prediction of adverse intrapartum outcomes at 35–37 weeks

M. Lopian,S. Prasad,E. Segal,A. Elmalech,A. Khalil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28349

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 190-190, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
OP01.09: Ultrasound predictors of abnormal severe neonatal outcomes in late fetal growth restriction

E. Karagölent,M. Ivan,R. MacSwan,V. Le Thanh,R. George‐Carey,R. Napolitano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27882

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 61-61, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.05: Evaluating an algorithm to enable a consistent approach to manage fetal growth

L.J. Stocker,A.J. Kermack,F. Tomlinson,R. Parasuraman,D.T. Howe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28333

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 185-185, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.51: Machine learning methods to predict fetal growth restriction: a systematic review

G. Zamagni,L. Monasta,C. Lees,T. Stampalija

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28379

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 197-197, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.24: Fetal biometry growth from first to second trimester and prediction of stillbirth risk

L. Lindström,O. Stephansson,S. Cnattingius,A. Wilcox,M. Granfors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28352

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 191-191, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.14: Computerised CTG features in small for gestational age and fetal growth restriction between 32+0 and 36+6 weeks

A. Dall'Asta,T. Nguyen,G. Morganelli,S. Sorrentino,E. Corno,G.M. Celora,B. Valentini,P. D'Amario,M. Capurso,M. Baffa,C. Melito,T. Ghi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28342

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 187-188, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP17.09: Performance of sFlt1 ‐PlGF ratio at 35–36 weeks of gestation in nulliparous women in identifying SGA, pre‐eclampsia and FGR

M.L. García Tinajero,F. Crovetto,F. Crispi,L. Youssef,J. Martinez Egea,D. Olmos,C. Trilla,E. Llurba,E. Gratacos,F. Figueras

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28666

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 264-264, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
OP05.08: The introduction of a fetal growth decision‐tool to improve consistency in management of ultrasound findings in late pregnancy

L.J. Stocker,A.J. Kermack,F. Tomlinson,R. Parasuraman,D.T. Howe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27914

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 72-73, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP06.25: Fetal ultrasound predictors for early postnatal intervention in congenital pulmonary airway malformations

N. Matsuzawa,Y. Yamamoto,Y. Kido,S. Masaoka,E. Kitamura,Y. Ishida,A. Takamizu,J. Takeda,A. Itakura

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28197

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 154-154, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.10: Sonographic surveillance and perinatal outcomes among pregnancies with periviable fetal growth restriction

F.V. LeMoine,A.C. Ranzini,M. Imbroane,E. Ghosalkar,D. Hackney,E. Hamburg‐Shields

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28338

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 186-186, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards

Ricardo Savirón-Cornudella,Luis Mariano Esteban,Rocío Aznar-Gimeno,Peña Dieste-Pérez,Faustino R. Pérez-López,Jose Manuel Campillos,Berta Castán-Larraz,Gerardo Sanz,Mauricio Tajada-Duaso

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132984

IF: 3.9

2021-07-03

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants have been associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs). In this work, we assess the predictive ability of the ultrasound-estimated percentile weight (EPW) at 35 weeks of gestational age to predict late-onset SGA and APOs, according to six growth standards, and whether the ultrasound–delivery interval influences the detection rate. To this purpose, we analyze a retrospective cohort study of 9585 singleton pregnancies. EPWs at 35 weeks were calculated to the customized Miguel Servet University Hospital (MSUH) and Figueras standards and the non-customized MSUH, Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), INTERGROWTH-21st, and WHO standards. As results of our analysis, for a 10% false positive rate, the detection rates for SGA ranged between 48.9% with the customized Figueras standard (AUC 0.82) and 60.8% with the non-customized FMF standard (AUC 0.87). Detection rates to predict SGA by ultrasound–delivery interval (1–6 weeks) show higher detection rates as intervals decrease. APOs detection rates ranged from 27.0% with FMF to 7.9% with the Figueras standard. In conclusion, the ability of EPW to predict SGA at 35 weeks is good for all standards, and slightly better for non-customized standards. The APO detection rate is significantly greater for non-customized standards.

medicine, general & internal
EP08.43: Sonographic surveillance and neonatal outcomes among pregnancies with periviable fetal growth restriction

F.V. LeMoine,A.C. Ranzini,M. Imbroane,E. Ghosalkar,D. Hackney,E. Hamburg‐Shields

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28371

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 195-195, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP17.06: Inter‐manufacturer assessment of the diagnostic performance of angiogenic ratio versus glycosylated fibronectin in women with suspected pre‐eclampsia

Y. Wah,D.S. Sahota,N.K. Wong,N. Lee,J. Liu,S. Lau,H. Leung,L.C. Poon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28664

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 263-263, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.23: Speckle tracking echocardiography in fetuses at risk for late‐onset FGR: can we discriminate SGA and FGR and predict the progression from SGA to FGR?

A. Dall'Asta,L. Youssef,L. Nogue,A. di Tonto,B. Valentini,M. Baffa,G. Schera,S. Sorrentino,C. Melito,G.M. Celora,E. Corno,T. Nguyen,T. Stampalija,S. Salvi,L. Sarno,G. Maruotti,F. Crispi,A. Lanzone,T. Ghi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28351

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 190-191, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP08.06: Maternal and fetal characteristics in large‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses

M. Barati,S. Janaki,R. Mohammad Jafari,N.N. Saadati,E. Farhadi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28334

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 185-185, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
OP13.04: Predictive performance of combined screening plus PlGF for fetal growth restriction

S. Acevedo‐Gallegos,A. Pérez García,J. Gallardo Gaona,B. Velazquez Torres,M.J. Rodriguez‐Sibaja,J. Ramirez‐Calvo,Y. Copado Mendoza,M.I. Lumbreras‐Marquez,D.M. Camarena Cabrera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27978

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 93-94, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP17.17: Plasma sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio as multiples of the median predicts pre‐eclampsia with severe features within two weeks

J. Espinoza,V. Calsavara,S. Kilpatrick,S. Rana,M. Costantine,K. Boggess,T. Moore Simas,J. Louis,S. Gaw,A. Murtha,S. Wiegand,Y. Gollin,D. Singh,R. Silver,D. Durie,B. Panda,E. Norwitz,I. Burd,B. Plunkett,R. Scott,E. Lemoine,R. Thadhani,A. Karumanchi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28674

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 266-266, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
OP02.05: AI‐enhanced detection of congenital heart disease suspicion in second trimester ultrasounds by OBGYN and MFM

J. Lam‐Rachlin,R. Punn,M. Lachaud,N. David,S. Garmel,R. Bessis,M. Heiligenstein,K.R. Sylvester‐Armstrong,J.P. Kennedy,A. Rebarber,N. Fox,D. Chelli,P. Boukobza,P. Uzan,G. Vaksmann,L. Cohen,M. Levy,B. Stos,M. De Boisredon,V. Thorey,E. Askinazi,C. Gardella,A. Arunamata

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27887

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 63-63, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP17.54: Assessment of the angiogenic ratio versus glycosylated fibronectin in predicting adverse neonatal outcome in women with suspected pre‐eclampsia

Y. Wah,D.S. Sahota,Y. Chen,N. Lee,S. Lau,H. Leung,L.C. Poon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28711

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 277-277, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics

EP08.15: Soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase 1 for the prediction of small for gestational age

EP08.01: Prediction of large‐for‐gestational‐age neonates at 35–37weeks

EP08.21: Prediction of adverse intrapartum outcomes at 35–37 weeks

OP01.09: Ultrasound predictors of abnormal severe neonatal outcomes in late fetal growth restriction

EP08.05: Evaluating an algorithm to enable a consistent approach to manage fetal growth

EP08.51: Machine learning methods to predict fetal growth restriction: a systematic review

EP08.24: Fetal biometry growth from first to second trimester and prediction of stillbirth risk

EP08.14: Computerised CTG features in small for gestational age and fetal growth restriction between 32+0 and 36+6 weeks

EP17.09: Performance of sFlt1 ‐PlGF ratio at 35–36 weeks of gestation in nulliparous women in identifying SGA, pre‐eclampsia and FGR

OP05.08: The introduction of a fetal growth decision‐tool to improve consistency in management of ultrasound findings in late pregnancy

EP06.25: Fetal ultrasound predictors for early postnatal intervention in congenital pulmonary airway malformations

EP08.10: Sonographic surveillance and perinatal outcomes among pregnancies with periviable fetal growth restriction

Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound–Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards

EP08.43: Sonographic surveillance and neonatal outcomes among pregnancies with periviable fetal growth restriction

EP17.06: Inter‐manufacturer assessment of the diagnostic performance of angiogenic ratio versus glycosylated fibronectin in women with suspected pre‐eclampsia

EP08.23: Speckle tracking echocardiography in fetuses at risk for late‐onset FGR: can we discriminate SGA and FGR and predict the progression from SGA to FGR?

EP08.06: Maternal and fetal characteristics in large‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses

OP13.04: Predictive performance of combined screening plus PlGF for fetal growth restriction

EP17.17: Plasma sFlt‐1/PlGF ratio as multiples of the median predicts pre‐eclampsia with severe features within two weeks

OP02.05: AI‐enhanced detection of congenital heart disease suspicion in second trimester ultrasounds by OBGYN and MFM

EP17.54: Assessment of the angiogenic ratio versus glycosylated fibronectin in predicting adverse neonatal outcome in women with suspected pre‐eclampsia